“…Archaeologists have traditionally viewed stone preferences in size, weight, cultural significance, and aesthetic value, through top‐down approaches that emphasize the managerial role of rulers in the construction of architecture. For example, in ancient Rome (e.g., Jackson & Marra, 2006), medieval Portugal (Sena da Fonseca et al, 2019), and medieval Eastern Normandy (e.g., Bromowicz & Magiera, 2013), provenance studies show that institutionalized elites largely shaped trade routes, the spatial organization, and even the aesthetic preferences of past societies. In this paper, we examine the case of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta (SNSM), in which noncentralized ancient societies built massive settlements provided with monumental stone masonry in the absence of hierarchical polities.…”