2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building typologies as a tool for assessing the energy performance of residential buildings – A case study for the Hellenic building stock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
84
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The current literature indicates that similar data are available for the USA and Belgium [5,14]. In addition, a common European approach (TABULA) has recently been developed for deriving building typologies, and an example of application to the Hellenic building stock is available [28]. Nonetheless, certain assumptions have to be made, e.g., regarding U-values and ventilation rates in relation to the age of the building, depending on the quality of the data available in the different Member States [14].…”
Section: Net Energy Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current literature indicates that similar data are available for the USA and Belgium [5,14]. In addition, a common European approach (TABULA) has recently been developed for deriving building typologies, and an example of application to the Hellenic building stock is available [28]. Nonetheless, certain assumptions have to be made, e.g., regarding U-values and ventilation rates in relation to the age of the building, depending on the quality of the data available in the different Member States [14].…”
Section: Net Energy Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology presented here combined different technologies that enriched the accuracy of the work. (Shorrock and Dunster, 1997)Johnston et al (2005) • UKDCM (Boardman, 2007) • DECarb (Natarajan and Levermore, 2007) • • • EEP (Jones et al, 2007) • • • CDEM (Firth et al, 2010) • • DECM (Cheng and Steemers, 2011) • VerbCO2M (Hens et al, 2001) • • TABULA (Dascalaki et al, 2011) • The methodology is conceived as a generic multi-staged methodology that can be replicated in the other neighbourhoods of the analysed city, or in any other city, by implementing the steps described herein. It has also been defined as a lively method that can be continuously updated with the addition of new variables or covariates in order to investigate other aspects and their relationship with building energy performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the existing residential building stock is so large and varied in Spain that defining a study period is essential. A chosen period provides the researcher with the building construction types and facilitates his concentration on the changes of thermal behavior due to different layers of the facades [6]. By knowing the thermal behavior, it is possible to provide a better solution on how to upgrade the energy efficiency for each type of facade.…”
Section: Study Period Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of buildings was initially based on the year of construction [6]. The number of buildings was obtained from data taken from the National Statistics Institute.…”
Section: Study Period Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%