1997
DOI: 10.3233/bme-1997-7405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulge ductility of several occlusal contact measuring paper-based and plastic-based sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…False positives are often seen. [2][3][4][5] Occlusal marking materials are proprietary and vary in thickness, type of ink, nature of backing, strength, and response to moisture. Millstein compared the markings from different occlusal marking systems in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…False positives are often seen. [2][3][4][5] Occlusal marking materials are proprietary and vary in thickness, type of ink, nature of backing, strength, and response to moisture. Millstein compared the markings from different occlusal marking systems in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically the occlusal marking material should only be used once or twice and then it should be replaced. Zuccari et al 2 used bulge testing to analyze stress-strain behavior of thin films backings of occlusal marking materials. They concluded that thin plastic backings are preferred because they adapt to the occlusal surfaces of the teeth when loaded and result in less false positive markings than paper based materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a method previously employed in dental research (e.g. McNamara & Henry, 1974; Ehrlich & Taicher, 1981; Wilding, Adams & Lewin, 1992; Zuccari et al ., 1997), and similar other techniques can be satisfactory with regard to existing criteria (Anderson, Schulte & Aeppli, 1993; Petrova & Ivanova, 1998). Furthermore, in our investigation all contacts registrations were recorded by the same dentist, thus avoiding interexaminer variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and reliability of the techniques currently used for occlusal analysis depend on the thickness, strength, and elasticity of the recording materials, as well as the oral environment and clinician’s interpretation ( 1 , 4 - 5 ). Both qualitative and quantitative methods are used for the evaluation of occlusal relationships ( 5 ).…”
Section: Classification Of Tooth-contact Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%