1996
DOI: 10.1021/ic950943a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulky Amidinate Complexes of Indium(III). Synthesis and Structure of [CyNC(tBu)NCy]2InCl

Abstract: Reaction of 2 equiv of lithium dicyclohexylacetamidinate with InCl(3) affords the new species In[CyNC(Me)NCy](2)Cl (Cy = cyclohexyl) (1). Compound 1 reacts with MeLi to yield In[CyNC(Me)NCy](2)CH(3) (2) and also reacts with a third equivalent of amidinate to yield In[CyNC(Me)NCy](3) (3). Two new bulky amidinate ligands are prepared by the addition of (t)BuLi to CyN=C=NCy and Me(3)SiN=C=CSiMe(3), respectively. Subsequent reactions with InCl(3) lead to the high-yield syntheses of In[CyNC(CMe(3))NCy](2)Cl (4) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both 12 and 13 exhibit distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination arrangements, with the HFxy ligands ( 12 ), or the extended Fet In–N contact nitrogen and the HFet In–N nitrogen ( 13 ), occupying the apical positions [ trans angles 12 175.54(7)°, 13 143.97(16)°, sum of equatorial angles 12 359.02°, 13 330.19°]. The In–Cl bonds of 12 [2.4066(7), 2.3676(7) Å] and 13 [2.3872(14), 2.3900(14) Å] are longer than that of [InCl(Fiso) 2 ] [2.3574(11) Å],10c but consistent with that of [InCl(CyNC( t Bu)NCy) 2 ] [2.405(4) Å, Cy = c ‐C 6 H 11 ] 26…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Both 12 and 13 exhibit distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination arrangements, with the HFxy ligands ( 12 ), or the extended Fet In–N contact nitrogen and the HFet In–N nitrogen ( 13 ), occupying the apical positions [ trans angles 12 175.54(7)°, 13 143.97(16)°, sum of equatorial angles 12 359.02°, 13 330.19°]. The In–Cl bonds of 12 [2.4066(7), 2.3676(7) Å] and 13 [2.3872(14), 2.3900(14) Å] are longer than that of [InCl(Fiso) 2 ] [2.3574(11) Å],10c but consistent with that of [InCl(CyNC( t Bu)NCy) 2 ] [2.405(4) Å, Cy = c ‐C 6 H 11 ] 26…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The hydride ligand was located from difference maps and refined isotropically; the InH bond length is 1.71(6) Å (av 1.68 Å in [InH 3 (PCy 3 )], C y =cyclohexyl4). The geometry of 1 is similar to that of the related indium chloride complex, [InCl{CyNC( t Bu)NCy} 2 ],14 and the only other example of a structurally characterized amidinate Group 13 hydride complex, [AlH{(Me 3 Si)NC(Ph)N(SiMe 3 )} 2 ],15 though the bulk of the Ar substituents in 1 cause it to be significantly more distorted. We believe that these groups also lead to the remarkable thermal stability of the complex by forming a heavily protected “pocket” in which the hydride ligand sits (Figure 1 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The hydride ligand was located from difference maps and refined isotropically; the In À H bond length is 1.71(6) (av 1.68 in [InH 3 (PCy 3 )], Cy = cyclohexyl [4] ). The geometry of 1 is similar to that of the related indium chloride complex, [InCl{CyNC(tBu)NCy} 2 ], [14] and the only other example of a structurally characterized amidinate Group 13 hydride complex, [AlH{(Me 3 -Si)NC(Ph)N(SiMe 3 )} 2 ], [15] though the bulk of the Ar substituents in 1 cause it to be significantly more distorted. We believe that these groups also lead to the remarkable thermal stability of the complex by forming a heavily protected "pocket" in which the hydride ligand sits (Figure 1 b).…”
Section: {C[n(ipr)ch] 2 }])mentioning
confidence: 81%