1985
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(85)90130-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bunsen flame hydrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6(a) also shows a very slight drop in velocity between the burner exit and the plane z = 4 mm, related to the outwards deflection of the streamlines in the boundary layer, mentioned above. This has also been observed by previous authors (Wagner & Ferguson 1985;Baillot et al 1992). Figure 6(b) shows that the radial profiles of the axial velocity at z = 1.5 mm are quite flat over the whole section.…”
Section: Flow With a Flame 321 No Acoustic Excitationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Figure 6(a) also shows a very slight drop in velocity between the burner exit and the plane z = 4 mm, related to the outwards deflection of the streamlines in the boundary layer, mentioned above. This has also been observed by previous authors (Wagner & Ferguson 1985;Baillot et al 1992). Figure 6(b) shows that the radial profiles of the axial velocity at z = 1.5 mm are quite flat over the whole section.…”
Section: Flow With a Flame 321 No Acoustic Excitationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The flame on the other hand shows an increase of 15% in the tip vicinity with a subsequent decay to about 75% past the flame tip. Comparable results have been found by Echekki and Mungal (1990) Wagner and Ferguson (1985), who also performed L D V measurements in a round Bunsen flame; they report a gradual decay of the mean centerline velocity in the potential region, followed by the sudden rise and subsequent decay at the tip. Wagner and Ferguson conclude that the presence of the flame affects the entire flowfield, while the present results suggest that the region of influence is more limited and extends primarily to the preheat zone.…”
Section: Laminar Flamessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This phenomenon may be due to a nozzle effect caused by the heating of the burner which is attenuated with y. This has been already observed in a laminar steady case [30] and in a turbulent case as well [31]. For y  10 mm, regard of excitation frequency used, an increase is observed, possibly due to expansion effects of gases.…”
Section: Unburned Gases Zonementioning
confidence: 64%