2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2018.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buoyancy effects on supercritical-pressure conjugate heat transfer of aviation kerosene in horizontal tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the value of Gr/Re 2 > 0.01, the buoyancy effect cannot be ignored in the heat transfer process and it should be considered in the process of numerical simulation. Figure 12 depicts the buoyancy criteria calculated by the empirical expressions for cases at different operating pressures: (a) Gr/Re 2.7 = 10 −5 used by Jackson and Hall 45 ; (b) Gr/Re 2 = 0.01 adopted by Jiang et al 46 It is found that Gr/Re 2.7 = 10 −5 cannot well indicate the onset and development of the heat transfer deterioration, which is obtained by numerical simulation in this paper, and this conclusion was also been reached in Sun et al 31 However, the buoyancy criterion used by Jiang et al appears to be qualitatively more appropriate. The heat transfer deterioration is first achieved to a serious state at the condition of 3 MPa.…”
Section: Description To the Buoyancysupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the value of Gr/Re 2 > 0.01, the buoyancy effect cannot be ignored in the heat transfer process and it should be considered in the process of numerical simulation. Figure 12 depicts the buoyancy criteria calculated by the empirical expressions for cases at different operating pressures: (a) Gr/Re 2.7 = 10 −5 used by Jackson and Hall 45 ; (b) Gr/Re 2 = 0.01 adopted by Jiang et al 46 It is found that Gr/Re 2.7 = 10 −5 cannot well indicate the onset and development of the heat transfer deterioration, which is obtained by numerical simulation in this paper, and this conclusion was also been reached in Sun et al 31 However, the buoyancy criterion used by Jiang et al appears to be qualitatively more appropriate. The heat transfer deterioration is first achieved to a serious state at the condition of 3 MPa.…”
Section: Description To the Buoyancysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, the increased operating pressure will enhance the heat transfer. Sun et al numerically studied the buoyancy effects at different conditions of the inlet flow direction, heat flux, and tube diameters, and the results showed that the buoyancy plays an important role at the conditions of a low inlet flow velocity, a high surface heat flux, and a large tube diameter. Cheng et al used various tube diameters to explore numerically the heat transfer of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel, and they stated that a larger tube diameter develops the buoyancy effect but diminishes the effect of thermal‐induced acceleration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, the outflow high-temperature fuel is injected into the combustor as a propellant. As the pressure in the combustion chamber is higher than the fuel's critical pressure, the heat transfer of hydrocarbon fuel in regenerative cooling channels is conducted under supercritical pressures [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nu b /Nu 0 = 1 + 1.67(T w0 − T pc )/T pc(9) Kang and Chang[38] measured the heat transfer coefficient of supercritical R134a (p cr = 4.01 MPa) flowing in a upward vertical tube. They correlated the 7022 data points within the range of p = 4.1-4.5 MPa, G = 600-2000 kg/m 2 s, and developed the following equation, in which the variations in heat capacity and density are taken into account.Nu b = 0.0244Re 0compares the experimental Nu with the four empirical heat transfer correlations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed process description on the regenerative cooling technique can be found in [4]. Generally, the critical pressure of hydrocarbon fuels is 2 and 3 MPa and they always work at supercritical condition due to the operating pressure 3.5-7.0 MPa of the combustor [5,6]. As is well known, the physical properties of supercritical hydrocarbon fuels change drastically at supercritical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%