2004
DOI: 10.1177/1350508404039658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bureaucracy Re-Enchanted? Spirit, Experts and Authority in Organizations

Abstract: Bureaucracy is challenged and examined from almost all quarters in organizational analysis. As part of wide debate over postmodern cultural theorizations there is now much debate over the viability and retention of bureaucratic forms of organization. It is often argued that bureaucracies have been displaced by more rapid-response entrepreneurial and strategic configurations. Yet we can observe examples of bureaucracy that deliberately select, repress, discard or restore elements of bureaucratic norms and value… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an undeniable reality that workplace spirituality is a construct widely discussed over the last few decades (Bell and Taylor, 2004;Casey, 2004;Driver, 2005;Duchon and Ashmos, 2005;Fry, 2003;Hicks, 2003;Krishnakumar and Neck, 2002;Lips-Wiersma, 2003;Lips-Wiersma and Mills, 2002;LundDean et al, 2003;Tischler, 1999), gaining the interest of both scholars and practitioners (Hicks, 2003;Kinjierski and Skrypnek, 2004;Krishnakumar and Neck, 2002). Within the framework of this discourse, it has been attempted to relate workplace spirituality to a wide variety of organisational functions and practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is an undeniable reality that workplace spirituality is a construct widely discussed over the last few decades (Bell and Taylor, 2004;Casey, 2004;Driver, 2005;Duchon and Ashmos, 2005;Fry, 2003;Hicks, 2003;Krishnakumar and Neck, 2002;Lips-Wiersma, 2003;Lips-Wiersma and Mills, 2002;LundDean et al, 2003;Tischler, 1999), gaining the interest of both scholars and practitioners (Hicks, 2003;Kinjierski and Skrypnek, 2004;Krishnakumar and Neck, 2002). Within the framework of this discourse, it has been attempted to relate workplace spirituality to a wide variety of organisational functions and practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This arguably puts the rigid, bureaucratised practices of 'protest businesses' in a more positive light and challenges the all-to-easy assumption that 'bureaucracy' is synonymous with elitist hierarchies and loss of character. On the contrary, one can argue that the basic principles of bureaucracy Á rationality, regulation, specialised roles and tasks, auditing Á remain crucial to keep the myriad practical matters of any organisation routinely running (Casey 2004). As Kallinicos (2003) notes, bureaucracy is often identified with Fordism, Taylorism or worse, Orwellian images of 'Big Brother' and the loss of identity in the face of tyrannical rule.…”
Section: Diy Social Movements In the Post-bureaucratic Age: Resistingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the beginning of the new millennium, the concept of workplace spirituality has received a great deal of attention in several research papers (Bell &Taylor 2004;Casey 2004;Driver 2005;Duchon & Plowman 2005;Fornaciari & Dean 2001;Fry 2003;Harter & Buzzanell 2007;Hicks 2003;Krishnakumar & Neck 2002;Lips-Wiersma 2003;Neal & Biberman 2003;Sass 2000). Gotsis and Kortezi (2008:576) argue that the increased interest in workplace spirituality could be due to people's individual pursuit of higher purpose and meaning making.…”
Section: Introduction Workplace Spirituality: Previous Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%