2008
DOI: 10.1080/01402380801905967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bureaucratic change in the European administrative space: The case of the European commission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Consistent with this, Balint et al (2008) show that the Commission administration, as regards the degree of politicisation of the higher management and the degree of openness of the career system, over time has moved away from its Continental origin and instead moved closer to a British or Scandinavian model, i.e. in crucial respects a more independent service.…”
Section: Executive Centre Formation At the European Levelmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…2 Consistent with this, Balint et al (2008) show that the Commission administration, as regards the degree of politicisation of the higher management and the degree of openness of the career system, over time has moved away from its Continental origin and instead moved closer to a British or Scandinavian model, i.e. in crucial respects a more independent service.…”
Section: Executive Centre Formation At the European Levelmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Political and administrative reforms have Accountability in the EU Commission 1099 contributed to a more rigorous regime for raising accountability in the Commission. New structures and rules with a range of ex ante constraints and ex post incentives combine to provide a system with more control and accountability in and over the Commission (Balint et al 2008;Bauer 2007;Christiansen and Gray 2004;Kassim 2004;Peterson 2004). In any event, there are now more mechanisms in place than ever before.…”
Section: Pressures To Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing enlargement coincided with the most relevant organizational reform the Commission has seen so far: the Kinnock reform of 2000 (Balint, Bauer et al 2008;Ellinas and Suleiman 2008;Kassim 2008;Kinnock 2004;Schön-Quinlivan 2008). This reform does not, however, play a relevant role in tracing the instruments that were developed in the enlargement context come across by other organizational units of the Commission.…”
Section: Organizational and Institutional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%