2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2020.03.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burning number of caterpillars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As proven in [5], spiders satisfy the conjecture. As proven in [9] and independently in [6], caterpillars satisfy the conjecture. In [7], it was proven that any graph with minimum degree δ ≥ 23 satisfy the conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As proven in [5], spiders satisfy the conjecture. As proven in [9] and independently in [6], caterpillars satisfy the conjecture. In [7], it was proven that any graph with minimum degree δ ≥ 23 satisfy the conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[6] conjectured that all connected graphs are well-burnable, and they showed that P n and C n are wellburnable. As showed in [17] and independently in [13], the caterpillar is well-burnable. Bonato and Lidbetter [8] proved that the generalized star is also well-burnable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…i=1 a i = t 2 for some t}. J 5 = {(13, 11, 1), (11,11,3), (22,13,1), (19,13,4), (17,13,6), (15,13,8), (13,13,10), (17,15,4), (15,15,6) (3,3), (4, 2), (5, 5)} and D 4 = {(2, 1), (4, 1), (4,3), (4,4), (6,1), (6,4), (6,5), (6,6), (7,7), (8,4), (8,6), (10,4)}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside improving the general upper bound for b(G), a common theme amongst papers in the graph burning literature is proving that specific graph classes are well-burnable. For instance, in addition to the previously mentioned graph classes, classes of trees including spiders and caterpillars have been proven to be well-burnable [7], [9], [12]. The contribution of this paper to the literature is to complement these findings but in a more general framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The condition that d > n−1 3 − 1 implies by [8] that G has a spanning caterpillar, say T . By [12], T is well-burnable. However by Theorem 3, b(G) ≤ b(T ) and so G is well-burnable.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 97%