Burnout Among Student-Athlete Services Professionals

Abstract

Literature on job burnout in athletics is limited to coaches, trainers, athletes, and administrators. Among student-services professionals, studies have focused on those in student support services, student affairs and mid-level administration. The purpose of this study was to explore factors why student-athlete services professionals burn out and consider leaving the profession. Themes from the literature on burnout include work overload, work environment/autonomy, evaluation/supervision, social support, and values/motivation/expectations. Burnout also serves as the theoretical framework for this study based on these six themes. The researchers sought volunteers from the N4A membership willing to be interviewed about burnout in the student-athletes services profession. We conducted interviews in Fall 2016 with 38 professionals in the field including directors, assistant/associate directors, advisors, learning specialists, and student-athlete development professionals with varying levels of experience in the field, which inform athletic administrators of the factors which lead to burnout and high turnover. The goal is to share this information as a mode of preventing burnout among talented student-athletes services professionals and their leaving the profession.

Teamwork Makes the Dream Work: Experiences of Student-Athletes in STEM with Dual Advising

“…Similar to Stokowski et al's (2016) and Rubin and Lewis' (2020) findings, academic advisors lacked knowledge regarding NCAA requirements, practice times, and other areas of the student-athlete experience. Non-athletes on campus are often unfamiliar with the work responsibilities of athletic advisors, who fulfill many job roles and often go above and beyond those duties (Rubin & Lewis, 2020;Rubin & Moreno-Pardo, 2018;Vaughn & Smith, 2018). At the research site, this lack of knowledge resulted in academic advisors employing a cookie-cutter advising approach and overrelying on athletic advisors to make decisions.…”

The Relationship between Academic Clustering and Athletic Academic Support Center Reporting Lines in NCAA FBS Programs

“…Some campus advisers also hold negative perceptions towards college athletes, such as that they are less qualified to complete academic work and that they expect athletic academic advisers to complete tasks for them, like determining their course schedule (Stokowski et al, 2016). There is also a noticeable disparity between the workload of athletic academic advisers, since some report working forty hours per week, while others work over sixty hours per week, and some only supervise 10 to 20 college athletes while others advise a few hundred (Rubin & Moreno-Pardo, 2018). Since athletic academic advisors play a significant role in advising college athletes, the relationship between the different reporting lines that they utilize and academic clustering is worthy of study.…”

Defining and Describing Mid‐Level Administrators in Intercollegiate Athletics

“…College sports relies heavily on a system of sponsored mobility for administrators’ and coaches’ career progression (Hoffman, 2011). Moreover, internal promotions from entry to mid‐level are uncommon; advancing to a more senior position typically requires relocating to another institution (Rubin & Moreno, 2018). Social capital developed from networking and mentoring relationships is therefore invaluable.…”

“…From a more psychological standpoint, researchers have identified burnout as another key factor that impacts athletic administrators’ career trajectories (Rubin & Moreno‐Pardo, 2018). Most positions in higher education are not traditional 9‐to‐5 jobs, but jobs in college sports are especially demanding.…”