2014
DOI: 10.1163/15685411-00002817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bursaphelenchus osumiana n. sp. (Tylenchomorpha: Aphelenchoididae) isolated from dead Pinus armandii var. amamiana in Osumi Islands in Japan

Abstract: An undescribed Bursaphelenchus species was isolated and cultured from materials collected during a field survey of a declining endemic pine species. Two nematode isolates were obtained from dead Pinus armandii var. amamiana on two islands (Yakushima and Tanegashima) in Kagoshima, Japan. The new nematode is described and illustrated herein as B. osumiana n. sp. Typologically, B. osumiana n. sp. is similar to B. parvispicularis and B. paraparvispicularis, i.e., males of these species have a short, stout spicule.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar conclusions on the evolution of relationships between Bursaphelenchus spp. and their woody Pinaceae and deciduous hosts were drawn by Kanzaki (Kanzaki, 2006;Kanzaki et al, 2014). The absence of strong co-evolution pattern of species in the hofmanni group with their plant hosts may be explained by their type of feeding: the nematodes feed and multiply in the wood of dying and dead trees and thus they do not depend on deep physiological relations with their plant hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar conclusions on the evolution of relationships between Bursaphelenchus spp. and their woody Pinaceae and deciduous hosts were drawn by Kanzaki (Kanzaki, 2006;Kanzaki et al, 2014). The absence of strong co-evolution pattern of species in the hofmanni group with their plant hosts may be explained by their type of feeding: the nematodes feed and multiply in the wood of dying and dead trees and thus they do not depend on deep physiological relations with their plant hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14.5 15.3 ± 1.0 (14.0-17.0) 12 ± 2.0 (11.0-15.0) 8.6 ± 1.2 (7.0-10.0) 9.7 ± 1.3 (8.0-11.0) Annuli (width of 12 12 ± 2.0 (10-15) 13 ± 2.0 (11-15) --10 at mid-body) Spicule length ( 19.0°18.6 ± 5.3 (12.0-28.0)°---along capitulum (condylus-rostrum) and extending spicule end (dorsal intersection) straight condylus; from B. ratzeburgii Rühm, 1956 in ratio of PUS to vulva-anus distance = 0.49 (0.46-0.51) vs 0.29 (0.28-0.3) (calculated from figures in original species description), female tail tip reflexed and digitate vs not reflexed and mucronate; from B. gerberi Giblin-Davis, Kanzaki, Ye, Center & Thomas, 2006 in spicule shape with the line along the capitulum (condylus-rostrum) and line extending the spicule end crossing dorsally vs ventrally (this character was used in: Giblin-Davis et al, 1993, 2006Ryss et al, 2005), condylus and rostrum equally prominent vs condylus very long and truncate and rostrum short; from B. anamurius Akbulut, Braasch, Baysal, Brandstetter & Burgermeister, 2007 in spicule length = 16 (13-18) vs 10 (9-11) μm, condylus well developed vs completely reduced, vulval flap small but distinct vs absent, tail tip reflexed vs only slightly curved; from B. corneolus Massey, 1966 in spicule shape with condylus and rostrum of equal length vs condylus very long and truncate and rostrum very short; the ratio of PUS length to VBD Kanzaki, Akiba, Kanetani, Tetsuka & Ikegame, 2014 in spicule shape with ratio of spicule length to its width posterior to rostrum = 3.9 (3.3-4.5) vs 2.0 (1.9-2.1) (calculated from figures in original species description), condylus prominent vs condylus small, not developed, cucullus well developed vs cucullus small and indistinct: PUS = 3.1 (2.6-3.4) vs 6.6 (5.4-7.2) VBD (calculated from measurements in original species description), female tail relatively shorter with c = 3.4 (3.1-3.5) vs 4.3 (4.0-5.0); from B. paracorneolus Braasch, 2000 in spicule shape with line along capitulum (condylus-rostrum) and line extending the spicule end crossing dorsally vs ventrally; spicular lamina mid-point of B. ulmophilus sp. n. moderate in width and not mitten-shaped vs excessively widened to mitten-shaped, condylus slightly flexed dorsally vs condylus dorsal line appearing as a straight continuation of dorsal lamina, ratio of PUS to VBD = 3.1 (2.6-3.4) vs 2.0 (1.7-2.4) (calculated from measurements in original species description); from B. paraparvispicularis Gu, Wang, Duan, Braasch, Burgermeister & Zheng, 2010 in the presence of a small cucullus at the spicule tip vs lack of a distinct cucullus, presence vs absence of a vulval flap, female tail relatively long with c = 3.4 (3.1-3.5) vs 2.8 (2.4-3.2), and tail tip reflexed vs only slightly ventrally curved; from B. parapinasteri Wang & Jang, 2007 in spicule shape which has the condylus long and slightly reflexed vs very short and perpendicular to the dorsal lamina of spicule (as in B. xylophilus group males), cucullus present vs absent, bursa bluntly rounded or truncated vs narrowly conical, female tail tip reflexed ventrally vs slightly curved ventrally and almost straigh...…”
Section: Diagnosis and Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) Bursaphelenchus osumiana is a junior synonym of B. wuae(Huang & Ye, 2006;Kanzaki et al, 2014b;Gu et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%