2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-009-9039-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business process management with the user requirements notation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Pourshahid et al [14] address a very important aspect concerning the customization and the improvement of a system, which is the alignment between business goals and the business process. It extends the User Requirements Notation (URN) [6,45] with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) [46], whose monitoring guides the alignment between goals and a business process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pourshahid et al [14] address a very important aspect concerning the customization and the improvement of a system, which is the alignment between business goals and the business process. It extends the User Requirements Notation (URN) [6,45] with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) [46], whose monitoring guides the alignment between goals and a business process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baresi et al [13] propose adaptation requirements, called adaptation goals, to customize a system at runtime and maintain a correct execution course. Pourshahid et al [14] study the alignment between requirements, expressed as goals, and the business process of an organization based on monitoring a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and then decide whether an adaptation action should take place. The context variability of a system environment is also a very important factor which highly affects the customization of requirements and we focus on it in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice how the worst and target values are mapped respectively to -1 and +1 levels, while the threshold value is mapped to 0. A linear interpolation 2 is used to approximate performance levels, as also described by System equation 1 [12]. For instance, the performance level (pl) for Figure 3 is pl(60) = |60−40| |80−40| = 0.5.…”
Section: Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works have also extended i* [22] and related frameworks (e.g., URN [23]) towards enterprise and business modeling, e.g., [24]. A recent extension of URN includes indicators [2], but does not address the question of how to link the business level view to technology. The BIM aims to unify various modeling concepts into a coherent framework with reasoning support and connection to enterprise data, built upon a firm conceptual modeling foundation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, strategic initiatives identify opportunities and enact change through a continuous process of monitoring and measurement to align operational performance with strategic targets. A tool-supported methodology that can integrate goals, processes and performance is essential to help management implement such initiatives by automating or semi-automating some of the implementation tasks [2]. In current practice, key performance indicators play a bridging role by integrating data from a variety of sources inside and outside an organization to measure how well strategic business targets are being met [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%