2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04202-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Process Maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MMs represent theories about how organizations evolve in a stage-by-stage manner along an anticipated, desired or logical path (Röglinger et al , 2012). MMs are, therefore, adequate for complex topics because the sequence of levels and their requirements, tracing multiple objectives and practices, can gradually lead the company through an improvement process (Wendler, 2012; Van Looy et al , 2014; Machado et al , 2017). In particular, MMs may have three different purposes (de Bruin et al , 2005): descriptive (diagnostic tools to assess the current capabilities of a company), prescriptive (identify desirable maturity levels and provide guidelines and improvement measures) and comparative (internal or external benchmarking).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMs represent theories about how organizations evolve in a stage-by-stage manner along an anticipated, desired or logical path (Röglinger et al , 2012). MMs are, therefore, adequate for complex topics because the sequence of levels and their requirements, tracing multiple objectives and practices, can gradually lead the company through an improvement process (Wendler, 2012; Van Looy et al , 2014; Machado et al , 2017). In particular, MMs may have three different purposes (de Bruin et al , 2005): descriptive (diagnostic tools to assess the current capabilities of a company), prescriptive (identify desirable maturity levels and provide guidelines and improvement measures) and comparative (internal or external benchmarking).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a follow-up study [30], the authors add further design elements to their comparative framework by conducting a content analysis of 69 maturity models, and transform the identified 14 design elements into a questionnaire that practitioners can use to find the maturity model that best fits their needs. The book authored by Van Looy [31] also provides a comprehensive overview of the framework and the 69 maturity models. The study provides contributions to the literature through extensive reviews and comparisons of existing BPMMs, including their structural characteristics and points of focus, such as assessment and improvement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies [34] an evolutionary progress in the demonstration of a specific ability or a maturity factor, such as people/culture, processes/structures, and objects/technology. MMs represent tools for systematically assessing and improving capabilities or critical factors for reaching goals [35]. An MM includes a sequence of levels that form an anticipated, desired, or logical path from an initial state to maturity.…”
Section: Maturity As Concept and The Organizational Entities To Whichmentioning
confidence: 99%