2016
DOI: 10.4103/0971-7749.182283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: An alternative approach for management of small- and medium-sized perforations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 15 studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. These included one RCT, 23 6 prospective studies, 9,12,13,[15][16][17] and 8 retrospective studies. 10,11,14,[18][19][20][21][22] These eligible studies were published between 2001 and 2020, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 15 studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. These included one RCT, 23 6 prospective studies, 9,12,13,[15][16][17] and 8 retrospective studies. 10,11,14,[18][19][20][21][22] These eligible studies were published between 2001 and 2020, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also supported these results that BCT achieves satisfactory graft uptake rates for TM repair. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Furthermore, cartilage grafts were preferred in patients with retraction pockets, Eustachian tube dysfunction, chronic mucosal dysfunction, and residual or reperforation. 34,35 Although the auditory gains may theoretically be influenced by the thickness and rigidity of the cartilage, 36 the results with short-term follow-up suggest identical ABG closure between cartilage and fascia grafts, 37,38 which coincides with our qualitative analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twenty studies (60.6%) were undertaken in India, three studies (9.1%) in China, two studies (6.1%) each in Thailand and Bangladesh, and one study (3.0%) each in Korea, Nepal, Iraq, Italy, Egypt, and Pakistan. In terms of study design, 13 studies (11,19,20,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) were randomized and 20 (7)(8)(9)(10)12,13,18,21,22,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44) were nonrandomized. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of all studies are summarized in Supplementary Content 3, http://links.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 studies recruited patients with dry ear status (11,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(31)(32)(33)35,36,(38)(39)(40)(42)(43)(44), three studies with wet ear status (30,34,37), and 7 studies with both dry and wet ear status (7)(8)(9)(10)12,13,41). Some studies only included microscopic myringoplasty (7-10, 12,13,18-21,24,26,31-33,35,37,40-42), some only endoscopic myringoplasty (27,28,30,34,38,44) and some included both types (11,19,20,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%