1981
DOI: 10.2307/3033858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bystander Intervention Into Crime: A Study Based on Naturally-Occurring Episodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method can also be viewed as a variation of matching sample techniques where variables of interest across treatment (in our case favorable news group) and control groups (in our case unfavorable news group) are compared. Matching sample techniques have been widely used across different disciplines including psychology, economics, and management science [23,28,30,31].…”
Section: The Portfolio Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method can also be viewed as a variation of matching sample techniques where variables of interest across treatment (in our case favorable news group) and control groups (in our case unfavorable news group) are compared. Matching sample techniques have been widely used across different disciplines including psychology, economics, and management science [23,28,30,31].…”
Section: The Portfolio Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also investigated factors such as the impact of the bystander's mood, sense of responsibility including nature of relationship to the person in need of help, locus of control, or esteem-orientation~see Dozier &Miceli, 1985 andMyers, 1999 for reviews;Huston, Ruggiero, Conner, & Geis, 1981;Michelini, Wilson, & Messe, 1975;Tice & Baumeister, 1985;Yee & Greenberg, 1998;Wispe, 1980!. Finally, some research suggests that skill level of bystanders is also important, with active bystanders more likely to have had previous training in emergency intervention or a strong sense of their own physical strength~e.g., Huston et al, 1981!. Bystander Education • Yet another group of studies focuses in more detail on the decision-making process for bystanders. This process includes consideration of the potential costs to bystanders of intervening or of not intervening, and the complex decision-making process that individuals may use when trying to decide what they will do~e.g., Dozier & Miceli, 1985;Fritzsche, Finkelstein, & Penner, 2000;Shaleff & Shichor, 1980!.…”
Section: Factors That Impact Bystander Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In social psychology there is a long tradition of research into whether and under what conditions individuals provide assistance to others in emergency or victimization situations, termed bystander intervention~Harari, Harari, & White, 1985;Huston, Ruggiero, Ross, & Gilbert, 1981;Laner, Benin, & Ventrone, 2001;Latane & Darley, 1968!. These studies have focused on how bystanders providing assistance in an emergency situation are influenced by various factors, ranging from sociodemographic characteristics of the bystander and the victim, such as whether they are married~Shotland & Straw, 1976!, to situational factors, such as the number of people present during the event~Borges & Penta, 1977!.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%