2005
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.2.366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-Fos After Incentive Shifts: Expectancy, Incredulity, and Recovery.

Abstract: Rats were used in a successive negative contrast procedure to determine which brain structures were activated by sucrose concentration downshifts, and on what day this occurred. Subjects were given preshift solutions for 12 days before being shifted to their postshift concentrations. Groups included 2 unshifted controls (32%-32% and 4%-4%) and 1 shifted group (32%-4%). Half of each group was killed 1 hr after the first exposure to the shifted solution (Shift 1), and half after the second exposure (Shift 2). Br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
40
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
7
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our gene expression results are consistent with these findings despite some methodological differences. A similar pattern of c-Fos induction to that which we observed was also evident in a recent study assessing regional gene expression in response to shifts in the incentive value of sucrose [64]. These findings suggest that the gene expression changes observed in the present study may play a role in altering the valuation of reward-paired cues used to guide behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our gene expression results are consistent with these findings despite some methodological differences. A similar pattern of c-Fos induction to that which we observed was also evident in a recent study assessing regional gene expression in response to shifts in the incentive value of sucrose [64]. These findings suggest that the gene expression changes observed in the present study may play a role in altering the valuation of reward-paired cues used to guide behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A clear demonstration of the importance of this latter issue can be seen with regard to the neural substrates of successive negative contrast, the exaggerated underresponding to a low value reward in a situation where a high value reward was expected (Flaherty, 1996). While Pecoraro and Dallman (2005) found no evidence of c-Fos activation in the gustatory thalamus (GT; parvicellular region of the ventral posteromedial nucleus) during the reward downshift trials, neurotoxic lesions of the GT completely prevent the occurrence of successive negative contrast (Reilly & Trifunovic, 1999;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus the current experiment extends the DA dialysis data by providing clues as to where central gustatory activity is processed before it reaches nucleus accumbens. Several other studies have examined the distribution of the protein products of the immediate early gene fos during sapid sucrose stimulation, but none have done so using sham intake or central lesions (9,15,47,70).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%