2019
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio as Prognostic Marker for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiotherapy

Abstract: Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the primary treatment for non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Despite favorable treatment outcomes in general, failure rates up to 40% occur in locally advanced disease. For treatment escalation or de-escalation strategies easily assessable and valid biomarkers are needed.Methods: We identified 125 patients with ASCC treated with standard CRT at our department. C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) was calculated dividing baseline CRP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NLR was not significantly associated with overall survival on univariate analysis using a threshold of 3 (HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.81-3. 41 prognostic of inferior cancer-specific survival, independent of TNM stage (HR 5.00, 95% CI 1.82 -13.69, p=0.002). There were no significant relationships between NLR and overall or cancer-specific survival on univariate analysis, regardless of threshold value used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NLR was not significantly associated with overall survival on univariate analysis using a threshold of 3 (HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.81-3. 41 prognostic of inferior cancer-specific survival, independent of TNM stage (HR 5.00, 95% CI 1.82 -13.69, p=0.002). There were no significant relationships between NLR and overall or cancer-specific survival on univariate analysis, regardless of threshold value used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus about the CAR cutoff for ICI-treated patients. Although the importance of CAR as a prognostic factor has already been reported in other squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) such as anal squamous cell carcinoma 24 and esophageal cancer 25 , the proposed cutoff values vary in the several literatures. The major possible reasons would be the differences in the calculating method or patient background such as disease stage or cancer type and indeed, a positive correlation between disease stage and CAR has been reported in SCC 22 , 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the importance of CAR as a prognostic factor has already been reported in other squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) such as anal squamous cell carcinoma 24 and esophageal cancer 25 , the proposed cutoff values vary in the several literatures. The major possible reasons would be the differences in the calculating method or patient background such as disease stage or cancer type and indeed, a positive correlation between disease stage and CAR has been reported in SCC 22 , 24 . While for preoperative head and neck cancer, the cutoff of CAR was set at 0.32 18 , it was set at 0.189 for cisplatin-based treated patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal cut-off for continuous variables was determined by using the maximally selected rank statistics by the ‘surv_cutpoint’ function of the ‘survminer’ R package ( 26 , 27 ). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (td-ROC) curve was estimated to assess the performance of the preoperative NLR, postoperative NLR, postoperative NLR change, preoperative NLR plus postoperative NLR, and postoperative NLR minus preoperative NLR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%