2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C4d: A Marker for Hepatic Transplant Rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in addition to defective synthesis (28), complement consumption may contribute to the dramatic reduction of serum complement levels seen in ALF. In particular, C4d is considered a specific marker of humoral immune response in renal allografts (29), and more recently it has been detected in acute liver allograft humoral rejection (30). Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that anti-HBc antibodies massively produced in the liver may combine with HBcAg, leading to the extensive formation of antigen-antibody complexes on the surface of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, resulting in the activation of the classical complement pathway and massive liver necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, in addition to defective synthesis (28), complement consumption may contribute to the dramatic reduction of serum complement levels seen in ALF. In particular, C4d is considered a specific marker of humoral immune response in renal allografts (29), and more recently it has been detected in acute liver allograft humoral rejection (30). Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that anti-HBc antibodies massively produced in the liver may combine with HBcAg, leading to the extensive formation of antigen-antibody complexes on the surface of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, resulting in the activation of the classical complement pathway and massive liver necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These include staining for C4d as a marker of rejection [75][76][77], for HCV antigens as a marker of HCV infection [78][79][80] and for the cell-cycle protein mcm-2 to identify the rate of proliferation in portal lymphocytes, which is higher in rejection than HCV [81]. Some of these approaches have helped to identify the main cause of graft damage when histological findings were otherwise inconclusive [78,79,81].…”
Section: Recurrent Hepatitis Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in other reports, late-phase chronic rejection tended to show a high percentage of C4d positivity and chronic hepatitis C showed low C4d positivity. 15,18 However, less than half of the acute rejection cases showed C4d positivity, and a similar frequency of C4d staining was observed in lobular hepatitis C, which makes it difficult to use C4d as a marker of acute rejection in patients with hepatitis C infection. In this series, C4d staining for crossmatch-negative and ABOcompatible/identical liver transplantation does not seem to be a useful marker for histological diagnosis.…”
Section: C4d In Liver Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Berlin group reported that half or more of patients diagnosed with acute rejection showed C4d deposits along portal vessels, mainly portal veins, and C4d may be a useful marker to distinguish acute rejection from recurrent hepatitis C. 11,14,15 Other groups emphasized that hepatic lobules or sinusoidal deposition was more specific in hepatic rejection and may be useful to differentiate rejection from recurrent viral hepatitis. 12,[16][17][18] Complement activation in the sinusoids may be seen in conditions other than rejection, and clinicopathological correlation is always necessary in the evaluation of C4d deposition. 27,28 Nonspecific staining should also be excluded using proper positive and negative controls.…”
Section: C4d In Liver Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation