Ultra Wideband - Current Status and Future Trends 2012
DOI: 10.5772/46080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cable Effects on Measuring Small Planar UWB Monopole Antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured IMBW is from 1.63 to 1.89 GHz (0.26 GHz, 14.8%), smaller than the simulated IMBW. The discrepancy is mainly due to the feeding cable used in measurement [29], [30], and to less extent due to the fabrication and measurement tolerances. The simulated and measured S11 and AR in CP are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The measured IMBW is from 1.63 to 1.89 GHz (0.26 GHz, 14.8%), smaller than the simulated IMBW. The discrepancy is mainly due to the feeding cable used in measurement [29], [30], and to less extent due to the fabrication and measurement tolerances. The simulated and measured S11 and AR in CP are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This eliminates the insertion losses caused by the cables and the bias T, and so on in the measured results. Figure shows large discrepancies between the simulated and measured results, which are mainly due to the cable effects explained as follows . When measuring monopole antennas with finite grounds, some currents will flow back to the outer surface of the feeding cable.…”
Section: Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In computer simulation, no feeding cable is used. When measuring small monopoles at low frequencies where the finite grounds become electrically small, some currents will flow back to the outer surface of the feeding cable, causing secondary radiation from the cable [11,12] and inaccuracies to the measured radiation patterns. Figure 5 shows the prototyped antenna connected with the short feeding cable.…”
Section: Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%