CAD/CAM-fabricated inlay restorations: Can the resin-coating technique improve bond strength and internal adaptation?

Rozan, Shin; Takahashi, Rena; Nikaido, Toru; Tichý, Antonín; Tagami, Junji

doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-309

Cited by 12 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… μTBS values of the combination Clearfil SE Bond2 + Panavia V5 and cementation with Panavia F2.0 were identical with those of a direct composite restoration. Rozan et al 2020 149 In vitro Bond strength and Internal adaptation Assessed the effect of the resin-coating technique (G-Premio Bond/Clearfil SE Bond 2+Clearfil Majesty ES Flow) on bond strength and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM inlays luted with different resin cements (PelyX Ultimate/G-CEM LinkForce/Panavia V5). Resin coating did not influence the bond strength of RelyX Ultimate, whereas resin coating increased the bond strength of G-CEM LinkForce and Panavia V5.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Samartzi¹,

Papalexopoulos²,

Sarafianou³

et al. 2021

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The immediate application of a dentin-bonding agent after tooth preparation and before impression-taking (immediate dentin sealing [IDS]) has been suggested to provide several advantages concerning bacterial microleakage, hypersensitivity, and bonding quality. We reviewed the literature and clarified certain aspects related to each step of IDS application. Materials and Methods The search strategy comprised an electronic research in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Ovid and Scopus for studies published from January 1990 to December 2020 regarding the IDS technique and including both in vitro and clinical studies. Results After exclusion of irrelevant or duplicate articles, 88 articles focusing on aspects of the IDS technique were assessed. IDS seems to be advantageous with regard to bond strength, gap formation, bacterial microleakage, and dentin hypersensitivity. However, issues arising from interaction with impression materials, the provisional phase, and conditioning methods before cementation require further investigation. Conclusion There are no documented reasons preventing clinicians applying IDS in their everyday practice. On the contrary, the presented technique seems to be beneficial in certain aspects regarding indirect restorations.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Samartzi¹,

Papalexopoulos²,

Sarafianou³

et al. 2021

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Resin-coating with a bonding agent and a flowable resin composite creates a thick layer (>100 μm) and deforms the prepared crown surface 11,13) . The one-bottle adhesive system is recommended for resin-coating for crown preparation 10) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of resin-coating on bond strength of resin cements to dentin and CAD/CAM resin block in single-visit and multiple-visit treatment

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of resin-coating using one-bottle adhesives on the bond strength of resin cements in single-visit and multiple-visit treatments. Three one-bottle adhesives were used for resin-coating and/or pre-treatment adhesives prior to cementation, in conjunction with resin cements from the same manufacturers: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick with Panavia V5 (UBQ/Pv5), Scotchbond Universal Adhesive with RelyX Ultimate (SBU/RxU), and Optibond All-in-one with NX3 Nexus (OP/NX3). Bovine dentin surfaces were left uncoated or resin-coated. After 1-h water storage (single-visit) or 1-week water storage with a non-eugenol temporary cement (multiple-visit), a CAD/CAM resin block was cemented to uncoated or resin-coated dentin surfaces. Microtensile bond strengths (µTBSs) were measured and statistically analyzed (α=0.05). Application of resin-coating improved µTBSs. The multiple-visit group exhibited lower values of µTBS than the single-visit group. Selection of the materials affected µTBSs. Resin-coating and single-visit treatment are desirable for CAD/CAM resin composite restorations.

show abstract

“…Thus, the oxygen inhibition layer that remained on the surface of the resin‐coating layer was not removed by rubbing with an alcohol‐impregnated cotton pellet. After 1 h of water storage to simulate the period between taking an impression with an intraoral scanner and cementation in the clinic, the unpolymerized monomers remained on the resin‐coating layer, resulting in superior bonding performance of the resin cement to the resin‐coated dentin 19,32 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the resin‐coating technique on the bonding performance of self‐adhesive resin cements in single‐visit computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing resin restorations

Oda

Takahashi

Nikaido

et al. 2021

J Esthet Restor Dent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This in vitro study investigated the influence of resin coating on the bonding performance of self‐adhesive resin cements in single‐visit computer‐aided design (CAD)/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAM) resin restorations. Materials and method CAD/CAM resin (1.5‐mm thick) was mounted on 20 noncoated and 20 resin‐coated human dentin surfaces using dual‐cured self‐adhesive resin cements (Panavia SA Cement Plus or Panavia SA Cement Universal, Kuraray Noritake Dental) in either self‐curing or dual‐curing mode. These specimens were sectioned into beam‐shaped sticks and subjected to microtensile bond strength tests after 24 h of water storage. The obtained data were statistically analyzed with three‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t tests (α = 0.05). Results The three‐way ANOVA results revealed the significant influence of resin coating, resin cement, and curing mode. Resin coating and light curing led to higher bond strengths in almost all groups. Resin‐coated dentin with Panavia SA Cement Plus exhibited a mean bond strength greater than 35 MPa in both self‐curing and dual‐curing modes. Conclusions In single‐visit CAD/CAM resin restorations, resin coating, resin cement selection, and curing mode influenced the bonding performance of self‐adhesive resin cements. In addition, resin coating and light curing increased the bond strength of self‐adhesive resin cements. Resin coating and light curing are encouraged for predictable bonding performance of dual‐cured self‐adhesive resin cements in single‐visit CAD/CAM resin restorations.

show abstract

CAD/CAM-fabricated inlay restorations: Can the resin-coating technique improve bond strength and internal adaptation?

Cited by 12 publications

References 27 publications

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Influence of resin-coating on bond strength of resin cements to dentin and CAD/CAM resin block in single-visit and multiple-visit treatment

Influence of the resin‐coating technique on the bonding performance of self‐adhesive resin cements in single‐visit computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing resin restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About