2002
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cadmium and Lead in Blood in Relation to Low Bone Mineral Density and Tubular Proteinuria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even after exposure ceases, the concentration in the blood never returns to preexposure levels. Thus blood cadmium has been proposed as one of the more accurate estimators of accumulated body burden (Alfven et al 2002). Only about 10% of whole-blood cadmium is circulating in serum, but serum levels appear to correlate with blood levels (Lauwerys et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after exposure ceases, the concentration in the blood never returns to preexposure levels. Thus blood cadmium has been proposed as one of the more accurate estimators of accumulated body burden (Alfven et al 2002). Only about 10% of whole-blood cadmium is circulating in serum, but serum levels appear to correlate with blood levels (Lauwerys et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the children were examined at a young age (range, 18–47 months), sufficient time may not have elapsed for the adverse effects on the bone to become manifest. In a cross-sectional study of 1,021 adults age 16–81 years, Alfvén et al (2002) also found no association between lead exposure and bone mineral density (BMD). However, the mean blood lead level was low among the subjects studied [3.1 μg/dL (Alfvén T, personal communication)]—suggesting that the lack of an association may have been attributed to low exposure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, because the children were examined at a young age (range, 18–47 months), sufficient time may not have elapsed for the adverse effects on the bone to become manifest. A study by Alfvén et al (2002) also found no association between lead exposure and bone mineral density (BMD) in a cross-sectional study of adults. However, the authors used concurrent blood lead level to define lead exposure and acknowledged that such a measure may be inadequate to measure body lead burden.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%