2017
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2017.290.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calabi–Yau property under monoidal Morita–Takeuchi equivalence

Abstract: Abstract. Let H and L be two Hopf algebras such that their comodule categories are monoidal equivalent. We prove that if H is a twisted Calabi-Yau (CY) Hopf algebra, then L is a twisted CY algebra when it is homologically smooth. Especially, if H is a Noetherian twisted CY Hopf algebra and L has finite global dimension, then L is a twisted CY algebra.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above result also can be obtained as a direct consequence of [4, Corollary 2.5], as well. Indeed, the Hochschild cohomological dimension of a Hopf algebra coincides with its (right or left) global dimension (this is pointed out in [50]), hence the result follows from Corollary 2.5 in [4], having in mind that since A and B are non trivial, the free product algebra A * B is necessarily infinite-dimensional, so is not semisimple, and hence cd(A * B) ≥ 1.…”
Section: Cohomologies Of Free Products Of Hopf Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above result also can be obtained as a direct consequence of [4, Corollary 2.5], as well. Indeed, the Hochschild cohomological dimension of a Hopf algebra coincides with its (right or left) global dimension (this is pointed out in [50]), hence the result follows from Corollary 2.5 in [4], having in mind that since A and B are non trivial, the free product algebra A * B is necessarily infinite-dimensional, so is not semisimple, and hence cd(A * B) ≥ 1.…”
Section: Cohomologies Of Free Products Of Hopf Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To conclude, it is interesting to note that the question of a generalization of Corollary 6.5 (positive answer to Question 1.1 in [8]) is studied as well in the recent preprint [50], in the setting of Hopf algebras having an homological duality, with interesting partial positive answers.…”
Section: Relations Between Cohomological Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the proof of the first statement (Theorem 8.1) is obtained by carefully inspecting arguments in [42,39] and the third one (Theorem 8.3) is a rather direct consequence of previous results [24,16,1], the main effort in this paper is in proving the second statement (Theorem 4.6). Removing the assumption S 4 = id from [7] (with instead the finiteness assumption on cohomological dimensions) enables us to compute cohomological dimension in a number of new situations, see Section 7 for examples regarding universal cosovereign Hopf algebras and free wreath products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Partial positive answers to Question 1.1 were provided in [6,7] when A, B are cosemisimple with antipode satisfying S 4 = id, and by Wang, Yu and Zhang in [39], when A is twisted Calabi-Yau and B is homologically smooth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent development, the study of infinite-dimensional Hopf algebras seems to be of growing importance, which reveals that some well-known results about finite-dimensional Hopf algebras surprisingly have incarnations in the realm of noetherian Hopf algebras (see, e.g., survey papers [3,6]). Among these progress, it is worthy to point out that the bijectivity of the antipode frequently plays an essential role in establishing these properties (see, e.g., [2,8,13,20]). Therefore, one prompts to ask for criterions concerning the bijectivity of the antipode of a Hopf algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%