2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcification in Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability: Friend or Foe?

Abstract: Calcification is a clinical marker of atherosclerosis. This review focuses on recent findings on the association between calcification and plaque vulnerability. Calcified plaques have traditionally been regarded as stable atheromas, those causing stenosis may be more stable than non-calcified plaques. With the advances in intravascular imaging technology, the detection of the calcification and its surrounding plaque components have evolved. Microcalcifications and spotty calcifications represent an active stag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
4
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultimate outcome of inflammation, mechanical stress, and intraplaque or intraleaflet haemorrhage is calcification [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], which has a variety of patterns considerably affecting the disease course [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. The dystrophic calcification of degraded ECM components and biomineralisation mediated by the osteochondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells are two different modalities of valve and plaque ossification [ 1 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate outcome of inflammation, mechanical stress, and intraplaque or intraleaflet haemorrhage is calcification [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], which has a variety of patterns considerably affecting the disease course [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. The dystrophic calcification of degraded ECM components and biomineralisation mediated by the osteochondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells are two different modalities of valve and plaque ossification [ 1 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, our data suggest a divergent effect of E2 based on timing with the acceleration of calcification in actively-growing lesions. A higher prevalence of intraplaque hemorrhage and calcification in stroke patients indicates an association between increased calcification and plaque vulnerability [ 34 ]. Therefore, the acceleration of calcification in the actively-growing lesions by E2 thereby could potentially increase the risk of ischemic events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of calcium within atherosclerotic lesions is also important in determining the susceptibility of the plaque to rupture and ensuing clinical consequences [ 34 ]. In advanced-lesions, calcification distribution was altered from a centralized deposition in the control-treated group to a more expansive even distribution along the length of the BCA in the E2-treated group, although without a change in overall calcified area or volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcalcifications can be detected by OCT; however, OCT has difficulty in visualizing cellular-level calcifications. Also NIRF has the ability to visualize osteoblastic activity ( 63 ). Only a limited studies are available on the use of OsteoSense in vascular biology and plaque vulnerability ( 59 ).…”
Section: Near-infrared Fluorescence (Nirf)mentioning
confidence: 99%