1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)47170-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium-induced Shape Change of Calmodulin with Mastoparan Studied by Solution X-ray Scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each lobe also contains a hydrophobic patch believed to serve as a binding site for calmodulin targets (LaPorte et al, 1980; Tanaka & Hidaka, 1980;Vogel et al, 1983;Newton et al, 1984). The size and shape of the globular domains determined by small-angle X-ray scattering studies of calmodulin in solution are consistent with those in the crystal, but the distance between them is significantly shorter (Seaton et al, 1985; Heidorn & Trewhella, 1988;Yoshino et al, 1989). The structure of Ca2+-saturated calmodulin in solution, currently being determined by three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR),1 may help to explain this discrepancy.2 Very little is known about the structure of Ca2+-free calmodulin except that it is different from that of Ca2+-saturated calmodulin [for reviews, see Forsen et al (1986), Evans et al (1988].…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each lobe also contains a hydrophobic patch believed to serve as a binding site for calmodulin targets (LaPorte et al, 1980; Tanaka & Hidaka, 1980;Vogel et al, 1983;Newton et al, 1984). The size and shape of the globular domains determined by small-angle X-ray scattering studies of calmodulin in solution are consistent with those in the crystal, but the distance between them is significantly shorter (Seaton et al, 1985; Heidorn & Trewhella, 1988;Yoshino et al, 1989). The structure of Ca2+-saturated calmodulin in solution, currently being determined by three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR),1 may help to explain this discrepancy.2 Very little is known about the structure of Ca2+-free calmodulin except that it is different from that of Ca2+-saturated calmodulin [for reviews, see Forsen et al (1986), Evans et al (1988].…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…the NMR spectra and small-angle X-ray scattering measurements of calmodulin complexed with mastoporan or the calmodulin-binding domain of myosin light chain kinase (Heidorn et al, 1989;Kataoka et al, 1989;Yoshino et al, 1989;Ikura et al, 1989). Flexibility in the central helix could therefore be essential for the mechanism of action of calmo-…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calmodulin-C20W complex appears to be a dumbbell shape, while the calmodulin-C24W complex is globular. In forming a globular complex, C24W appears to fall in to the same group as the calmodulin-binding peptides melittin (Kataoka et al, 1989), mastoparan (Matsushima et al, 1989;Yoshino et al, 1989), and the Ml3 peptide derived from the calmodulin-binding domain of myosin light chain kinase (Heidorn et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, while the crystal structure of calcium-saturated CaM indicates that CaM contains two homologous globular domains which include an extended eight-turn R-helix often referred to as the central helix (9)(10)(11), high-field NMR measurements suggest that in solution the central helix is disrupted between Asp 78 and Ser 81 , resulting in the independent rotational motion of the opposing globular domains of CaM (7,(12)(13). However, the observed structural uncoupling between the opposing globular domains observed using NMR spectroscopy is inconsistent with a range of other biochemical and biophysical measurements, including small-angle X-ray scattering and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, which suggest that there are important structural transitions associated with each of the opposing globular domains upon calcium activation that result in concerted conformational changes involving both amino-and carboxyl-terminal domains (6,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). The apparent discrepancy between results obtained using NMR spectroscopy and these later results may be related to the fact that NMR spectroscopy detects only conformational states that are both highly populated and long-lived (34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%