There are 100 million tonnes of carbon
emissions from
China’s
paper industries, which attracts growing interest in their sustainability
under the dual-carbon targets. Reasonable technological upgrading,
waste paper recycling, and waste resource utilization can positively
affect the sustainable development of paper manufacturing. Hence,
the environmental and economic performance of paper from four pulping
technologies (chemical mechanical, chemical, biomechanical, and waste
paper pulping) were analyzed via Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life
Cycle Costing (LCC) methods. LCA results show that paper from chemical
pulp is optimal, reducing 591.6–1385.7 kg CO2 equiv/t
compared to others. LCC results indicate paper from biomechanical
pulp has the highest economic benefits, with net profits outperforming
others by $52.2–84.6/t. Moreover, environmental differences
were investigated for papermaking wastes (black liquor (BL) and paper
sludge (PS)) management options. The 80% caustic combustion of BL
has the best environmental benefits, saving 154.3–331.6 kg
of CO2 equiv/t compared to other methods. The production
of paperboard from PS is more environmentally friendly, causing 200
kg of CO2 equivalent/t less emissions than landfill. Finally,
various waste paper recovery rates (60%, 70%, and 80%) and technology
substitution scenarios were designed from the provincial perspective.
The results indicate that the current carbon emissions and energy
consumption (CEEC) of paper from wood pulp are 13.51 Mt CO2 equiv and 7.05 million GJ, respectively. Based on an 80% recovery
rate and the adoption of advanced pulping technologies, the national
CEEC can be reduced by 32.4% and 50.06%, respectively. In economic
terms, advanced pulping technology application can increase total
revenue by 30.2%. With the implementation of the optimal waste management
programs, the national CEEC can be reduced by 27.8% and 65.3%, respectively.