Abstract:In a cut-off Woods-Saxon (CWS) potential with realistic depth S-matrix poles being far from the imaginary wave number axis form a sequence where the distances of the consecutive resonances are inversely proportional with the cut-off radius value, which is an unphysical parameter. Other poles lying closer to the imaginary wave number axis might have trajectories with irregular shapes as the depth of the potential increases. Poles being close repel each other, and their repulsion is responsible for the changes o… Show more
“…The distributions of the complex poles can be visualized if we plot the landscape of the function −F (k) defined in Ref. [15] on the same domain of the complex k-plane as we considered in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Cws Results For a Heavy Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed in Ref. [15] that close lying resonances interact with each other, therefore we analyze the first mountain only when the other one is far enough not to interact with the resonances of the first mountain.…”
Section: Cws Results For a Heavy Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [13], [14], [15], let us sketch briefly how the pole solutions of the radial equation are calculated numerically. We introduce left and right solutions of the radial equation in Eq.…”
The positions of the l = 0 S-matrix poles are calculated in generalized Woods-Saxon (GWS) potential and in cut-off generalized Woods-Saxon (CGWS) potential. The solutions of the radial equations are calculated numerically for the CGWS potential and analytically for GWS using the formalism of Gy. Bencze [1]. We calculate CGWS and GWS cases at small non-zero values of the diffuseness in order to approach the square well potential and to be able to separate effects of the radius parameter and the cut-off radius parameter. In the case of the GWS potential the wave functions are reflected at the nuclear radius therefore the distances of the resonant poles depend on the radius parameter of the potential. In CGWS potential the wave function can be reflected at larger distance where the potential is cut to zero and the derivative of the potential does not exist. The positions of most of the resonant poles do depend strongly on the cut-off radius of the potential, which is an unphysical parameter. Only the positions of the few narrow resonances in potentials with barrier are not sensitive to the cut-off distance. For the broad resonances the effect of the cut-off can not be corrected by using a suggested analytical form of the first order perturbation correction.
“…The distributions of the complex poles can be visualized if we plot the landscape of the function −F (k) defined in Ref. [15] on the same domain of the complex k-plane as we considered in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Cws Results For a Heavy Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed in Ref. [15] that close lying resonances interact with each other, therefore we analyze the first mountain only when the other one is far enough not to interact with the resonances of the first mountain.…”
Section: Cws Results For a Heavy Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [13], [14], [15], let us sketch briefly how the pole solutions of the radial equation are calculated numerically. We introduce left and right solutions of the radial equation in Eq.…”
The positions of the l = 0 S-matrix poles are calculated in generalized Woods-Saxon (GWS) potential and in cut-off generalized Woods-Saxon (CGWS) potential. The solutions of the radial equations are calculated numerically for the CGWS potential and analytically for GWS using the formalism of Gy. Bencze [1]. We calculate CGWS and GWS cases at small non-zero values of the diffuseness in order to approach the square well potential and to be able to separate effects of the radius parameter and the cut-off radius parameter. In the case of the GWS potential the wave functions are reflected at the nuclear radius therefore the distances of the resonant poles depend on the radius parameter of the potential. In CGWS potential the wave function can be reflected at larger distance where the potential is cut to zero and the derivative of the potential does not exist. The positions of most of the resonant poles do depend strongly on the cut-off radius of the potential, which is an unphysical parameter. Only the positions of the few narrow resonances in potentials with barrier are not sensitive to the cut-off distance. For the broad resonances the effect of the cut-off can not be corrected by using a suggested analytical form of the first order perturbation correction.
“…Naturally, the accuracy of the estimated distance might be influenced by the nonlinearity of the polynomial in (14). Nonlinearities can be caused by the interaction of the close lying poles 8 and by the accuracy of the calculated k m values.…”
Section: Analytical Behavior Of the Sfr Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamow shell model (GSM) 1 became a useful tool in analyzing drip line nuclei produced in laboratories with radioactive beam facilities. A most recent analysis of this type is that of the 7 Be(p,γ) 8 B and the 7 Li(n,γ) 8 Li reactions in Ref. 2 The key elements of GSM are the Berggren-ensembles of single particle states.…”
Cutting off the tail of the Woods-Saxon and generalized Woods-Saxon potentials changes the distribution of the poles of the S-matrix considerably. Here we modify the tail of the cut-off Woods-Saxon (CWS) and cut-off generalized Woods-Saxon (CGWS) potentials by attaching Hermite polynomial tails to them beyond the cut. The tails reach the zero value more or less smoothly at the finite ranges of the potential. Reflections of the resonant wave functions can take place at different distances. The starting points of the pole trajectories have been reproduced not only for the real values and the moduli of the starting points but also for the imaginary parts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.