Numerical Techniques for Boundary Element Methods 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-14005-4_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Blade-Vortex Interaction of Rotary Wings in Incompressible Flow by an Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method Including Free Wake Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9) and the source terms, Eqs. (14) and (15). First the formulation for the velocities is presented where a distinction between sources and targets is made.…”
Section: Fast Multipole Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(9) and the source terms, Eqs. (14) and (15). First the formulation for the velocities is presented where a distinction between sources and targets is made.…”
Section: Fast Multipole Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lattice methods are the most widely used method for rotor wake prediction to represent the shed and trailed vorticity generated by the rotor, see for example Röttgermann et al [15] and the study by Padakannaya [16]. Vortex Particle…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effort that is necessary to correctly reproduce the vortex system differs for the different computational methods that can be applied for the analysis. In the case of a vortex-lattice method [3,4], for instance, the vortex system is directly obtained from the interaction of the vortex filaments that are shed from the blade. Thus, no vortex dissipation at all is present and BVI effects can be reproduced with a comparatively low computational effort.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DLM offers a faster way of computing unsteady aerodynamic loads, but it is a linear method restricted to small out-ofplane harmonic motions with a flat wake. Hence, while the DLM has dominated in fixed-wing aircraft aeroelasticity, the UVLM has been gaining ground in situations where free-wake methods become a necessity because of geometric complexity, such as flapping-wing kinematics [69][70][71], rotorcraft [72,73], or wind turbines [74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. With the advent of novel vehicle configurations and increased structural flexibility for which the underlying assumptions of the DLM no longer hold, the UVLM constitutes an attractive solution for aircraft dynamics problems and has been recently exercised in problems such as unsteady interference [53,81], computation of stability derivatives [82], flutter suppression [83], gust response [8,84], optimisation [85], morphing vehicles [86], and coupled aeroelasticity and flight dynamics [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%