2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of interstrand coupling losses in superconducting Rutherford cables with a continuum model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current density is assumed uniformly distributed in each strand cross section. The transport current distribution and redistribution between strands occurs through distributed electrical conductances, and self and mutual inductances, according to the nonlinear electric circuit of a cable element described in [28]. The whole electrical model is obtained assembling a total of N strand strands, conductances and inductances becoming matrices of dimension N strand .…”
Section: A Electrothermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current density is assumed uniformly distributed in each strand cross section. The transport current distribution and redistribution between strands occurs through distributed electrical conductances, and self and mutual inductances, according to the nonlinear electric circuit of a cable element described in [28]. The whole electrical model is obtained assembling a total of N strand strands, conductances and inductances becoming matrices of dimension N strand .…”
Section: A Electrothermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the extremities of the cable, the voltage difference between all strands is set to zero, thus assuming an equipotential boundary condition. Details on the impact of the boundary conditions on current distribution in the presence of time varying external magnetic fields are reported in [28].…”
Section: A Electrothermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cable is described through a distributed parameters electric circuit, in which the strands are connected to each other through contact conductances and mutual inductances, taken uniform along the cable length. The electromagnetic model, applied in [31] to compute the long-range coupling currents in Rutherford cables, was recently modified to allow the computation of short-range coupling currents and corresponding losses [32].…”
Section: A Electro-thermal Stability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current redistribution plays an important role in what the signatures of many observed quench signals look like. Although we have good understanding of main characteristics of current redistribution it is still unclear what exactly the role of splices is, leading to competitive assumptions (boundary conditions) [4] needed to analyze magnet data or design magnets. One of the problems is that related tests done so far are mostly on cables alone [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and not on operating magnets and this is especially true for Nb3Sn based data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we have good understanding of main characteristics of current redistribution it is still unclear what exactly the role of splices is, leading to competitive assumptions (boundary conditions) [4] needed to analyze magnet data or design magnets. One of the problems is that related tests done so far are mostly on cables alone [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and not on operating magnets and this is especially true for Nb3Sn based data. Studying all aspects of a quench in real magnets is non-trivial and although analysis tools and simulations are ever improving [4], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] experiments are still unavoidable in probing fine effects during magnet operation and transients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%