2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of nanoparticle capture efficiency in magnetic drug targeting

Abstract: The magnetic targeted drug delivery system of Avil´es, Ebner and Ritter, which uses high gradient magnetic separation (HGMS) is considered. In that model large ferromagnetic particles are used as seeds to aid collection of multiple domain nanoparticles (radius ≈ 200 nm).Here, in contrast, single domain magnetic nanoparticles (radius in 20-100 nm) are considered and the Langevin function is used to describe the magnetization. The magnetic targeted drug delivery system of Avilés, Ebner and Ritter, which uses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidently there is not a complete modeling framework and there is no single software package for simulating the entire process, since this would require the integration of multiparticle simulation, molecular simulation, continuum-based models, stochastic methods and nanomechanics. A number of deterministic dynamic modeling approaches for magnetic targeting are presented in (23,78,80,87,88,(96)(97)(98). Nonetheless, critical physical parameters of endovascular navigation are captured by the simplified model depicted in Figure 13, where the untethered nanocapsule is subjected to the apparent weight, magnetic force and torque, and hydrodynamics.…”
Section: Multiscale Modeling and Computational Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently there is not a complete modeling framework and there is no single software package for simulating the entire process, since this would require the integration of multiparticle simulation, molecular simulation, continuum-based models, stochastic methods and nanomechanics. A number of deterministic dynamic modeling approaches for magnetic targeting are presented in (23,78,80,87,88,(96)(97)(98). Nonetheless, critical physical parameters of endovascular navigation are captured by the simplified model depicted in Figure 13, where the untethered nanocapsule is subjected to the apparent weight, magnetic force and torque, and hydrodynamics.…”
Section: Multiscale Modeling and Computational Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where H 0 is the applied homogeneous magnetic field as in Figure 2 and φ represents the reduced magnetic scalar potential which in the region outside the stent wires is given by [20,19,21] …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the average projection of m the moment in the direction of B total can be calculated from the Langevin function [19,20,6,7,8]…”
Section: Outline Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, ferromagnetic materials such as wires, seeds and stents are implanted into the body to increase the local magnetic field strength and this technique is called Implant Assisted Magnetic Drug Targeting (IA-MDT) [5,6,7,8]. Typically IA-MDT models to date have assumed that vessel and implant are considered as rigid and not subjected to any mechanical forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%