2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.024401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of NMR chemical shifts for extended systems using ultrasoft pseudopotentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
1,093
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 873 publications
(1,116 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
1,093
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten possible models were geometry-optimized using first principles electronic structure calculations as implemented in CASTEP (28,36,37), and the NMR parameters and powder XRD patterns associated with the resulting structures were calculated; Table S1 details the eight geometry-optimized structures that give NMR parameters that are, in some way, comparable with experiment, while bearing in mind that the calculated NMR chemical shifts are those for 0 K, whereas experimental values are determined at room temperature. In addition, we took into account that the accuracy of the 13 C chemical shifts in these calculations is ∼1-2% of the chemical shift range of 13 C [i.e., ±(2-4) ppm] (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten possible models were geometry-optimized using first principles electronic structure calculations as implemented in CASTEP (28,36,37), and the NMR parameters and powder XRD patterns associated with the resulting structures were calculated; Table S1 details the eight geometry-optimized structures that give NMR parameters that are, in some way, comparable with experiment, while bearing in mind that the calculated NMR chemical shifts are those for 0 K, whereas experimental values are determined at room temperature. In addition, we took into account that the accuracy of the 13 C chemical shifts in these calculations is ∼1-2% of the chemical shift range of 13 C [i.e., ±(2-4) ppm] (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GIPAW method 58 , used with ultrasoft Vanderbilt-type pseudo-potentials 59,60 , provides an efficient method to calculate chemical shifts in crystalline solids 61 .…”
Section: D Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance parameters were calculated using the GIPAW [73][74][75][76] approach which enables the calculation 70 of chemical shifts, electric field gradients and J couplings. Calculations were performed using the experimental X-ray diffraction crystal structure of lithium diborate (ICSD reference code: 65930), as well as geometry optimised (CASTEP) structures (both at X-ray diffraction and optimised 75 lattice parameters).…”
Section: First-principles Calculation Of 2 J Bb Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%