2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2016.2611582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of PM Eddy Current Loss in IPM Machine Under PWM VSI Supply With Combined 2-D FE and Analytical Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have been conducted to overcome the hassle of analyzing eddy currents of PMs using 3-D FEA [13][14][15][16]. Some studies have discussed the reduction of eddy current losses by dividing a PM that forms one pole into several segments [17,18].…”
Section: Of 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to overcome the hassle of analyzing eddy currents of PMs using 3-D FEA [13][14][15][16]. Some studies have discussed the reduction of eddy current losses by dividing a PM that forms one pole into several segments [17,18].…”
Section: Of 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 has some physical meanings. When the skin depth or (1/ f h ) 0.5 is large at low frequency, locating at the resistance‐limited region [21], the PM ECL factors are almost constant because the eddy current circulating path keeps almost unchanged. When the skin depth is smaller than a certain value with the increase of frequency, locating at the inductance‐limited region, the square roots of PM ECL factors drops almost linearly with the decrease of (1/ f h ) 0.5 , which makes the factors at arbitrary frequencies can be easily inferred with the interpolation method.…”
Section: Relationships Between Hfhvs and Corresponding Eclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the eddy current reaction and the axial segmentation effects were both considered in the analytical models of [18][19][20], current sources were used as the inputs in these methods. However, the highfrequency harmonic currents themselves caused by the PWMinduced HFHVs are hard to be accurately determined at the design stage due to the eddy current reaction effect [21]. More importantly, for PMs with arbitrary shapes, it will become more difficult to deduce the analytical PM ECL models [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stator currents cause asynchronous components in the air-gap field and induce rotor losses in electrical machines [39][40][41]. Control of PMSMS by pulse width modulation (PWM) can lead to PM losses due to the high frequency of stator magnetic field variations [42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The eddy-current losses are mainly produced by the carrier harmonics of the PWM inverter [49].…”
Section: Supply and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%