2022
DOI: 10.1177/10775463221099353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the dynamic responses of a railway track on a non-uniform foundation

Abstract: The dynamic response of a railway track has been investigated by analytical or numerical models. When rail supports (sleepers) or foundation contain defects, the damage reduces stiffness and the track becomes non-uniform. This paper presents a new analytical model to calculate the dynamic responses of a railway track on a non-uniform foundation. In this model, the rail is considered as an infinite beam resting on equidistant supports and subjected to moving forces. The sleepers responses are stable provided th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the third axle passes, the rail 2 is subjected a bigger reaction force (60.12 kN) while reaction force applied on the rail 1 is the same (47.87 kN). This phenomenon affects on the dynamic sleeper responses which have been demonstrated by Tran et al, [12]. When the fourth axle passes, the rail 2 is subjected a reaction force which is slightly smaller than the one applied on the rail 1 (47.57 kN compare with 47.87 kN) even though the train loads are the same.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the third axle passes, the rail 2 is subjected a bigger reaction force (60.12 kN) while reaction force applied on the rail 1 is the same (47.87 kN). This phenomenon affects on the dynamic sleeper responses which have been demonstrated by Tran et al, [12]. When the fourth axle passes, the rail 2 is subjected a reaction force which is slightly smaller than the one applied on the rail 1 (47.57 kN compare with 47.87 kN) even though the train loads are the same.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 91%
“…This work has been carried out with the two beams models for the rail. Tran et al, [12] presented an analytical model to calculate the track responses with non-uniform foundation. The dynamic responses of railway sleeper have been investigated by Tran et al, [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of elastic wave theory in the geometric setting during modeling offers the third advantage of the approach to the design of 'closed' measurement systems [67][68][69][70][71][72]. The third benefit lies in the fact that no additional artificially imposed constraints, such as boundary conditions, are needed in the consideration of the process of propagation of the impact impulse by means of elastic waves in different directions.…”
Section: Approach Towards the Design Of The 'Closed' Measurement Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take into account the distribution of discrete supports, Mead [13,14] developed the periodically supported beam model under moving loads for the rail. This model type has been also investigated for elastic foundations [15][16][17][18]. A fast analytical method to calculate the dynamic responses of railway sleepers has been presented by Tran et al [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%