2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the surface potential and surface charge density by measurement of the three-phase contact angle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At pH 3, silica surfaces are essentially uncharged because this is close to the point of zero charge [30]. At pH 10, the silanol groups are largely deprotonated and the silica surface carries a negative charge [31]. To compensate this charge, cations need to adsorb to the interfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH 3, silica surfaces are essentially uncharged because this is close to the point of zero charge [30]. At pH 10, the silanol groups are largely deprotonated and the silica surface carries a negative charge [31]. To compensate this charge, cations need to adsorb to the interfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33and Eq. (36)) , developed in our studies, using surface charge and surface potential dependence on aqueous solution pH theoretically explain the coupling of the thermodynamic contact angle to surface potential and surface charge density (Horiuchi et al, 2012).. Therefore, our models ((Eq.…”
Section: Relationship Of Our Models To Observed Ph Dependent Trends Omentioning
confidence: 95%
“…8shows that the surface charge density, positive below the point of zero charge pH and negative above the point of zero charge pH, is pH dependent (Kosmulski , 2011). Also, by electrostatic theory, a given surface charge density will give rise to a surface potential (Horiuchi, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Derivation Of Ph Dependent Solid-liquid Interfacial Tension mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the importance of surface charge density to surface chemistry, extensive molecular dynamic simulations have been performed to calculate the surface charge density for solutions of different ionic composition and pH value 3,4 ; and many attempts have been made to experimentally measure this and other related quantities 5,6 . So far atomic force microscopy (AFM) 711 , surface plasmonic resonance 12,13 , streaming potential 1418 , and contact angle titration 1921 are among the most studied techniques that can produce information related to the surface charge density although none of the existing methods, to our best knowledge, can easily and directly measure the polarity and amount of surface charge in the natural environment where surface reactions take place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the streaming potential technique is more suitable for comparing surface properties between different surface modifications and studying zeta potential dependence on pH value and ionic strength of the solution 15,16 . In addition to the above methods, people have also measured contact angles to determine the surface charge density at the liquid/solid interface 1921 . By combining the Young-Lippmann equation with the Guoy-Chapman model for electrical double layer, the dependence of surface potential and surface charge density on the solution pH value has been studied 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%