1977
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560120109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations of the magnetic shielding constants of heavy nuclei in polyatomic molecules

Abstract: AbstractsCoupled Hartree-Fock perturbation theory has been applied to compute the nuclear magnetic shielding tensors for "0, 14N, and 13C in the molecules of water, ammonia, and methane with four wave functions of increasing accuracy, expanded over basis sets of Gaussian functions. The agreement with the experimental data available for ammonia and methane is very good. Quantities necessary to evaluate the shielding for an arbitrary gauge are also given. The degree of gauge-invariance of the calculated properti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Their analysis is revised and completed hereafter, relying on the van Vleck 2 and Ramsey approaches 3-5 based on Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (RSPT), and allowing for the results obtained by Arrighini, Maestro, and Moccia (AMM), 6-8 extended later on. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] We confute the conclusions arrived at in Ref. 1 arguing that the point of view, shared by Kutzelnigg, Fleischer, and Schindler (KFS), 16 that the natural gauge origin coincides with the nucleus is correct, and that the criticism of Malkina et al 1 is partially inappropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 Their analysis is revised and completed hereafter, relying on the van Vleck 2 and Ramsey approaches 3-5 based on Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (RSPT), and allowing for the results obtained by Arrighini, Maestro, and Moccia (AMM), 6-8 extended later on. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] We confute the conclusions arrived at in Ref. 1 arguing that the point of view, shared by Kutzelnigg, Fleischer, and Schindler (KFS), 16 that the natural gauge origin coincides with the nucleus is correct, and that the criticism of Malkina et al 1 is partially inappropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] For a molecule with n electrons and N nuclei, charge, mass, position with respect to an arbitrary origin, canonical, and angular momentum of the ith electron are indicated by −e, m e , r i ,p i , l i = r i ×p i , i = 1, 2. . .…”
Section: Magnetic Properties and Electronic Current Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations