Calibrated peer review for computer‐assisted learning of biological research competencies

Abstract

Recently, both science and technology faculty have been recognizing biological research competencies that are valued but rarely assessed. Some of these valued learning outcomes include scientific methods and thinking, critical assessment of primary papers, quantitative reasoning, communication, and putting biological research into a historical and broader social context. This article presents examples of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) assignments that illustrate a computer-assisted method to help students achieve biological research competencies. A new release of CPR is appropriate for engaging students online in reading and writing about investigations. A participant perception inventory was designed for use as a repeated measure to discriminate among beginning, middle, and ending student perceptions.Examples are provided to demonstrate how to assess student perceptions of what they gain from instruction related to science research competencies. Results suggest that students in a large enrollment class consider CPR to be useful for helping them learn about quantitative and categorical research variables; the use of the experimental method to test ideas; the use of controls; analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data; and how to critically read primary papers.

Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers

“…Critical-thinking and scientific reasoning skills are core learning objectives of science education for all students, regardless of whether or not they intend to pursue a career in science or engineering. Consistent with the view of learning as construction of understanding and meaning ( National Research Council, 2000 ), the pedagogical practice of writing has been found to be effective not only in fostering the development of students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge ( Gerdeman et al , 2007 ) and communication skills ( Clase et al , 2010 ), but also scientific reasoning ( Reynolds et al , 2012 ) and critical-thinking skills ( Quitadamo and Kurtz, 2007 ).…”

Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course

“…, 2008; Gunersel and Simpson, 2009; Rourke et al. , 2008; Clase et al. , 2010), while others have reported no benefit from the program (Walvoord et al.…”

Reflecting on Graphs: Attributes of Graph Choice and Construction Practices in Biology

“…While these studies focused on graph interpretation, the concepts and skills that they studied are integral to graph construction as well. Before constructing the graph, the graph constructor should have a clear purpose in mind, along with an adequate understanding of variables and graph types ( Berg and Smith, 1994 ; Friel and Bright, 1996 ; Clase et al. , 2010 ; Grunwald and Hartman, 2010 ; Angra and Gardner, 2016 ).…”