Autonomous Air and Ground Sensing Systems for Agricultural Optimization and Phenotyping III 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2305746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrated plant height estimates with structure from motion from fixed-wing UAV images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a minimum cost of $3,280 per season for just collection of plant height information. Although DSM and other methods (e.g., LiDAR, proximal imagery) have been previously used to measure plant and canopy heights, they were used for crops like sorghum, wheat, and corn with vertical growth habit (Han et al, 2018;Madec et al, 2017;Watanabe et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018;Yuan F I G U R E 7 Relationship between manually taken plant height and derived height from regression equation (Equations 1 and 2) for (a) the ground point (GP) method, and (b) the digital terrain model (DTM) method. The data points represented actual height of peanut canopy in centimeters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is a minimum cost of $3,280 per season for just collection of plant height information. Although DSM and other methods (e.g., LiDAR, proximal imagery) have been previously used to measure plant and canopy heights, they were used for crops like sorghum, wheat, and corn with vertical growth habit (Han et al, 2018;Madec et al, 2017;Watanabe et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018;Yuan F I G U R E 7 Relationship between manually taken plant height and derived height from regression equation (Equations 1 and 2) for (a) the ground point (GP) method, and (b) the digital terrain model (DTM) method. The data points represented actual height of peanut canopy in centimeters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) photogrammetry was successfully used to determine plant height in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench], wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L), and corn (Bendig, Bolten, & Bareth, 2013;Freeman et al, 2007;Holman et al, 2016;Watanabe et al, 2017;Demir, Sönmez, Akar, & Ünal, 2018;Han et al, 2018;Wang, Singh, Marla, Morris, & Poland, 2018;Yuan et al, 2018). In these studies, the authors compared manually measured plant height with height derived T A B L E 1 Weekly dates for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight with red-green-blue (RGB) camera and manual height measurement of peanut plots for the mini-core study, 2017 along with weeks after planting (WAP) using 3D surface models created using structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry (Bendig et al, 2013;Holman et al, 2016;Demir et al, 2018).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deployment of high‐throughput technologies for field phenotyping has been limited in sorghum to date, but development and testing of instrumentation for collecting field data fast and accurately is ongoing with more efforts likely to follow. The latest technology for in‐field sorghum phenotyping currently consists of remote sensing (Shafian et al ., ), UAVs (Shi et al ., ; Han et al ., ), autonomous ground robots (Salas‐Fernandez et al ., ), advanced imaging (Potgieter et al ., ) and machine learning (Vijayarangan et al ., ). For sorghum, plant height (Salas‐Fernandez et al ., ; Watanabe et al ., ; Hu et al ., ; Pugh et al ., ) and stalk width (Salas‐Fernandez et al ., ; Gomez et al ., ) are the two major traits that have been successfully phenotyped by high‐throughput phenotyping platforms in the field.…”
Section: Advances To Identify and Utilize Genetic Variation For Sorghmentioning
confidence: 99%