“…These technologies have been proven to be sensitive for remote monitoring of health and welfare in farmed fish [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] and could be promising tools in the context of precision livestock farming [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. However, the use of such devices in free-swimming fish for estimating energetic costs related to swimming, including those in aquaculture conditions, requires mapping with physiological data such as MO 2 [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. As the MO 2 is known to vary as a function of different biotic and abiotic factors (e.g., species, life stage, stress state, temperature, water quality, and oxygen concentration), the inference of MO 2 using accelerometer tags needs an accurate calibration for a specific species, at a given size and temperature, before it can be used in aquaculture environments [ 1 , 2 ].…”