2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating spatial models of trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the present study, when the variables production, consumption and prices were evaluated, the maximum difference found between the estimated and observed values is 9%. According to Paris, Drogué and Anania, (2011), there are several reasons why the results may not be identical to those observed. These include: the existence of unobservable costs, the occurrence of measurement errors when estimating demand and supply functions and differences in terms of marketed products.…”
Section: Base Scenario and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For the present study, when the variables production, consumption and prices were evaluated, the maximum difference found between the estimated and observed values is 9%. According to Paris, Drogué and Anania, (2011), there are several reasons why the results may not be identical to those observed. These include: the existence of unobservable costs, the occurrence of measurement errors when estimating demand and supply functions and differences in terms of marketed products.…”
Section: Base Scenario and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Positive mathematical programming is now the preferred approach for calibrating farm management models. PMP was first developed by Howitt (1995) to address land-use allocation problems in agriculture (e.g., Röhm and Dabbert 2003), but has increasingly been adapted for use in trade modeling and other resource management settings (Weintraub et al 2007;Paris et al 2011;Heckelei et al 2012;Mérel and Howitt 2014). PMP can be used to estimate crop-specific marginal cost functions and, thereby, replicate farmers" observed crop allocation decisions (Mérel and Bucaram 2010;Mérel et al 2011).…”
Section: Calibrating Agricultural Business Risk Management Models: Bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ocorrem nas transações comerciais de forma agregada e servem para fazer a calibração do modelo (PARIS et al, 2011). O objetivo da etapa de calibração é corrigir possíveis distorções ocorridas entre os dados observados e estimados.…”
Section: Calibração Do Modelo E Custos Das Transações Comerciaisunclassified