2018
DOI: 10.1140/epjti/s40485-018-0047-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of a multi-anvil high-pressure apparatus to simulate planetary interior conditions

Abstract: This paper presents the setup and pressure calibration of an 800-ton multi-anvil apparatus installed at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) to simulate pressure-temperature conditions in planetary interiors. This high-pressure device can expose cubic millimeter sized samples to near-hydrostatic pressures up to~10 GPa and temperatures exceeding 2100°C. The apparatus is part of the Distributed Planetary Simulation Facility (DPSF) of the EU Europlanet 2020 Research Infrastructure, and significantl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-pressure experiments were carried out using a cubic anvil press (180 ton, CT-factory, Tokyo, Japan) calibrated with phase transitions of bismuth [ 33 ]. The Cu-BTC powder was encapsulated in a cylindrical copper capsule, which was embedded in a NaCl filler and then a graphite tube heater, which were then placed in a 13 mm pyrophyllite cube with stainless steel electrodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-pressure experiments were carried out using a cubic anvil press (180 ton, CT-factory, Tokyo, Japan) calibrated with phase transitions of bismuth [ 33 ]. The Cu-BTC powder was encapsulated in a cylindrical copper capsule, which was embedded in a NaCl filler and then a graphite tube heater, which were then placed in a 13 mm pyrophyllite cube with stainless steel electrodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus has undergone a detailed and adequate pressure calibration procedure with an error of less than 0.3 GPa. The pressure calibrations for the apparatus at room temperature were performed according to the phase transitions of Bi (I‐II at 2.55 GPa, II‐III at 2.77 GPa, and III‐V at 7.7 GPa) (Knibbe et al., 2018) and ZnTe (I‐I′ at 6.6 GPa, I′‐II at 8.9 GPa, and II‐III at 12.1 GPa) (Endo et al., 1982), with uncertainties of less than 0.3 GPa. The pressure calibrations at high temperature (1473 K) were based on phase transitions of coesite‐stishovite at 9.2 GPa (Zhang et al., 1996) and Mg 2 SiO 4 olivine‐wadsleyite at 13.6 GPa (Katsura et al., 2004).…”
Section: Experiments Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bi II-III and III-V phase transitions are sluggish in solid pressure media, and thus, the minimum in the electrical resistance labeled as "II-III" in Figure 2 was typically placed at 3.1 GPa for the pressure calibration of multi-anvil assemblies [19,20]. The Bi III-V phase transition at 7.7 GPa was indicated by the start of electrical resistivity reduction [17]. For pressure calibrations at high temperatures using 18 mm octahedra with gaskets cast from 646 ceramic, quench experiments were performed on amorphous or crystalline SiO2 powders [18] near the pressure-temperature conditions appropriate to the quartz-coesite phase transition (see Figure 3 for the cross section of the high-temperature assembly).…”
Section: Pressure Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new approach presented here can easily be adopted to any MAP laboratory. Our "injection-molded" octahedra were tested in our mineral physics laboratory at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, using both 1000-ton and 2000-ton presses equipped with Walker-design multi-anvil devices through a series of pressure-calibration experiments based upon the room temperature, pressure-dependent phase transitions in bismuth (Bi) [17], and the high-temperature phase transition in SiO 2 from quartz to coesite [18]. We then compare the pressure-generating efficiency and thermal-insulating properties of our cast ceramic octahedra to the calibrations for the corresponding 14/8 and 10/5 COMPRES cell assemblies (where the first number refers to the octahedron's OEL and the second number refers to the cube's TEL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%