1990
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1990)116:2(247)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of SWMM Runoff Quality Model with Expert System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, only impervious areas were used by SWMM in simulating weekly TN and TP export. Using the expert methodology proposed by Baffaut and Delleur (), initial values for maximum buildup were calculated using the maximum observed loadings (kg/ha/week) multiplied by a factor of six to achieve an adequate maximum limit. Although a factor of six may not represent a universal value, other than Baffaut and Delleur (), there was limited guidance found on choosing a maximum buildup value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, only impervious areas were used by SWMM in simulating weekly TN and TP export. Using the expert methodology proposed by Baffaut and Delleur (), initial values for maximum buildup were calculated using the maximum observed loadings (kg/ha/week) multiplied by a factor of six to achieve an adequate maximum limit. Although a factor of six may not represent a universal value, other than Baffaut and Delleur (), there was limited guidance found on choosing a maximum buildup value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the expert methodology proposed by Baffaut and Delleur (), initial values for maximum buildup were calculated using the maximum observed loadings (kg/ha/week) multiplied by a factor of six to achieve an adequate maximum limit. Although a factor of six may not represent a universal value, other than Baffaut and Delleur (), there was limited guidance found on choosing a maximum buildup value. Washoff coefficients and exponents were taken from Baffaut and Delleur () using an initial buildup rate constant of one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantity assessment criteria, a model calibration can be considered good if the average RE is within ยฑ10 % and the average ARE is less than 15 % (Baffaut and Delleur 1989;Sriananthakumar and Codner 1992). For quality assessment criteria, Baffaut and Delleur (1990) suggested that a good calibration must have an average ARE less than 20 % while Sivakumar et al (1995) suggested less stringent criteria; good when the average ARE is less than 30 % and satisfactory when the average ARE is less than 60 %. 2.…”
Section: Goodness-of-fit Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWMM is a comprehensive hydrological simulation model that is commonly applied to designing the quality and quantity models of runoffs in urban areas (Ackerman and Schiff, 2003;Baffaut and Delleur, 1990;Borah and Bera, 2003;Denault et al, 2006;Maharjan et al, 2009;Tsihrintzis and Hamid, 1998). As understood, even though the RNN can easily build a water level prediction model at the gauged sites, the difficulty in predicting the water levels at an ungauged site is due to its unavailability of real observations for the training and evaluation of a RNN.…”
Section: Storm Water Management Model (Swmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%