2019
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of δ17O and 17Oexcess values of three international standards: IAEA‐603, NBS19 and NBS18

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For high accuracy δ 13 C determinations, the similarity of the 17 O/ 18 O relationship in IAEA‐603‐CO 2 and NBS19‐CO 2 cannot be taken for granted. Recently, δ 17 O values for IAEA‐603, NBS19 and NBS18 were measured with high accuracy 43 . In this study, CO 2 was extracted from a few milligrams of carbonate RMs by reaction with H 3 PO 4 in the same way as used at the IAEA (acid reaction at 25°C, see more details in Barkan et al 43 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For high accuracy δ 13 C determinations, the similarity of the 17 O/ 18 O relationship in IAEA‐603‐CO 2 and NBS19‐CO 2 cannot be taken for granted. Recently, δ 17 O values for IAEA‐603, NBS19 and NBS18 were measured with high accuracy 43 . In this study, CO 2 was extracted from a few milligrams of carbonate RMs by reaction with H 3 PO 4 in the same way as used at the IAEA (acid reaction at 25°C, see more details in Barkan et al 43 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Uncertainties are given at k = 1. The17 O excess values in Barkan et al43 for NBS19 and IAEA-603 are representative (several ampoules of each RM) and self-consistent. Small negative17 O deviations of carbonate-based CO 2 from the reference line (VSMOW line with λ = 0.528) reflect the position of the VPDB-CO 2 oxygen triple-isotope scale relative to the respective VSMOW scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Differences reported by different laboratories should agree, even if the absolute values may differ. However, the difference 17 O(NBS19)-17 O(NBS18) reported by (Wostbrock et al, 2019) and (Fosu et al, 2020) is -0.050 ‰, whereas (Passey et al, 2014) and (Barkan et al, 2019) reported smaller differences, -0.037 ‰ and -0.019 ‰, respectively. Part of the difference may be due to sample preparation.…”
Section: Interlaboratory Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(Wostbrock et al, 2019) used a calcite fluorination method to extract CO2, the other studies measured the CO2 extracted from carbonate using H3PO4 acid digestion. The relative difference between 17 O(NBS18) and 17 O(IAEA603) (a replacement for NBS19) is reported as -0.042 ‰ by Sha et al, (2020) and -0.010 ‰ by (Barkan et al, 2019). The relative difference between the carbonate standards can be determined independently using the fragment technique developed in this PhD thesis (see below).…”
Section: Interlaboratory Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation