Integration sites for many retrotransposons and retroviruses are determined by interactions between retroelement-encoded integrases and specific DNA-bound proteins. The Saccharomyces retrotransposon Ty5 preferentially integrates into heterochromatin because of interactions between Ty5 integrase and the heterochromatin protein silent information regulator 4. We mapped over 14,000 Ty5 insertions onto the S. cerevisiae genome, 76% of which occurred in heterochromatin, which is consistent with the known target site bias of Ty5. Using logistic regression, associations were assessed between Ty5 insertions and various chromosomal features such as genome-wide distributions of nucleosomes and histone modifications. Sites of Ty5 insertion, regardless of whether they occurred in heterochromatin or euchromatin, were strongly associated with DNase hypersensitive, nucleosome-free regions flanking genes. Our data support a model wherein silent information regulator 4 tethers the Ty5 integration machinery to domains of heterochromatin, and then, specific target sites are selected based on DNA access, resulting in a secondary target site bias. For insertions in euchromatin, DNA access is the primary determinant of target site choice. One consequence of the secondary target site bias of Ty5 is that insertions in coding sequences occur infrequently, which may preserve genome integrity.T he insertion of mobile genetic elements into new chromosomal sites profoundly impacts genome structure and evolution. For many mobile elements, integration sites are not chosen randomly. Target site biases are particularly well-documented for the LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses (1-3). These retroelements replicate by reverse-transcribing mRNA into cDNA and then inserting the cDNA into their host's genome using an element-encoded integrase (IN). Retrotransposons are among the most abundant interspersed repeats in eukaryotic genomes, and retroviruses are often used as vectors for gene therapy. Understanding mechanisms of retroelement target site choice, therefore, has value for both basic and applied research.In the best studied cases, retroelement target site choice is dictated by interactions between IN and specific DNA-bound proteins. HIV IN, for example, interacts with the transcription coactivator lens epithelial-derived growth factor (4), and sites of HIV integration are influenced by sites of this protein's chromosomal occupancy (5). The role of chromatin in target site choice is also well-established for model yeast retrotransposons. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Tf1 element inserts preferentially into regions upstream of some genes transcribed by RNA polymerase (pol) II (6). Tf1 IN interacts with the transcription factor Atf1p (7), and at the fbp1 promoter, Atf1p alone mediates target site choice (8). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ty1 and Ty3 retrotransposons prefer to integrate upstream of genes transcribed by RNA pol III, likely because of interactions between IN and components of the pol III machinery or associated chromatin (9, 10)....