1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5018-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calorimetry in High-Energy Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p1 and p0 are constants, E is the mean of the energy distribution, and σ is the standard deviation (see [4] for a more thorough analysis of energy resolution for sampling calorimeters).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p1 and p0 are constants, E is the mean of the energy distribution, and σ is the standard deviation (see [4] for a more thorough analysis of energy resolution for sampling calorimeters).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate this, Ref. [16] Unfortunately, no public plots are available to demonstrate the impact of this calibration sequence. Regardless, the GSC has been observed to change the central value of the JES by only a small amount, while significantly improving the resolution, thus serving the first purpose it was designed for.…”
Section: Global Sequential Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…energy hadrons from tens of GeV to hundreds of GeV in hadron calorimeters [4][5][6][7]. These studies have indicated a square root dependence on the thickness t of the hadron energy resolution on the absorber thickness.…”
Section: Jinst 9 T09003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this simulation study, the effect of the variation in plate thickness on hadron energy resolution is analysed using fixed energy single pions. Earlier, such studies have concentrated on very high energy hadrons from tens of GeV to hundreds of GeV in hadron calorimeters [4,5,6,7]. These studies have indicated a square root dependence on the thickness t of the hadron energy resolution on the absorber thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%