2017
DOI: 10.5937/sejodr4-15528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cameriere’s European formula for age estimation: A study on the children in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It claimed that significant overestimation is due in theory to the different rates of dental development in different populations (Willems et al 2001). Evaluation of dental development was considered as a reliable method for predicting age, as maturation events associated with tooth formation are less variable, and the mineralization of teeth is not affected by the external factors, such as crowding, retention, or early extraction of deciduous teeth (Chertkow and Fatti 1979;Maia et al 2010;Latić-Dautović et al 2017). As a developing country with a huge population, socioeconomic and nutritional status may affect the skeletal and dental growth of children in Indonesia (Cameriere et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It claimed that significant overestimation is due in theory to the different rates of dental development in different populations (Willems et al 2001). Evaluation of dental development was considered as a reliable method for predicting age, as maturation events associated with tooth formation are less variable, and the mineralization of teeth is not affected by the external factors, such as crowding, retention, or early extraction of deciduous teeth (Chertkow and Fatti 1979;Maia et al 2010;Latić-Dautović et al 2017). As a developing country with a huge population, socioeconomic and nutritional status may affect the skeletal and dental growth of children in Indonesia (Cameriere et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent systematic review, the authors reported delayed dental development in 14 studies comparing children with and without CL/P according to DM (Van Dyck et al, 2019). Willems method and EF showed more reliable age assessment in forensic context, based on dental development (Cameriere et al, 2007; Djukic at al., 2014; Guo et al, 2015; Latic-Dautovic et al, 2017). Therefore, the estimation of dental development utilizing more objective formulas, not influenced by sex, morphological tooth characteristics, and ethnic background, such as WM and EF, could add a new perspective to the determination of the right timing for orthodontic and surgical treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the 14-year age group, underestimation of dental age was observed amongst males in the age group of 13-14 years (0.77 ± 0.76). Latic-Dautovic et al reported a similar error in the 14-year age group when they used the Cameriere European formula on the sample panoramic radiographs of orthodontic patients in Bosnia and Herzegovina [ 25 ]. A recent meta-analysis by Hostiuc et al evaluated the actual variability of the mean difference between the chronological and dental age using the Cameriere method in different age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%