2019
DOI: 10.1130/abs/2019am-334115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAN A FRAGMENTED PAST BE TRUSTED? ASSESSING PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN THE SQUAMATE FOSSIL RECORD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include anatomical measurements from a total of 283 fossil lizard specimens, with 44 recognized genera and at least 33 recognized species, from the Paleogene record of the U.S. Western Interior (Table 1 and S1 Dataset). Only fossil lizard specimens with complete cranial bones or associated limb bones were sampled (e.g., Fig 3), for the following reasons: 1) the lizard fossil record is mostly comprised of cranial bones and, fortunately, most extant phylogenetic morphological characters for lizards are found in cranial bones [62,63], making it possible to determine at least coarse taxonomic identifications (family or higher) for fossil lizard specimens from cranial material [63]; 2) historical fossil identification may lack fidelity at the genus or species level [64][65][66]; 3) cranial and limb bones can be used to estimate SVL in lizards [9,34]. A few measured specimens included complete skulls (Fig 3A and 3I) or even skeletons (Figs 4A and 5).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include anatomical measurements from a total of 283 fossil lizard specimens, with 44 recognized genera and at least 33 recognized species, from the Paleogene record of the U.S. Western Interior (Table 1 and S1 Dataset). Only fossil lizard specimens with complete cranial bones or associated limb bones were sampled (e.g., Fig 3), for the following reasons: 1) the lizard fossil record is mostly comprised of cranial bones and, fortunately, most extant phylogenetic morphological characters for lizards are found in cranial bones [62,63], making it possible to determine at least coarse taxonomic identifications (family or higher) for fossil lizard specimens from cranial material [63]; 2) historical fossil identification may lack fidelity at the genus or species level [64][65][66]; 3) cranial and limb bones can be used to estimate SVL in lizards [9,34]. A few measured specimens included complete skulls (Fig 3A and 3I) or even skeletons (Figs 4A and 5).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%