2011
DOI: 10.1097/smj.0b013e3182297169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Model Predictive of Vitamin D Status Be Developed From Common Laboratory Tests and Demographic Parameters?

Abstract: Given the failure to find a sufficiently predictive model for vitamin D deficiency, we propose that there is no substitute for laboratory testing of 25(OH)D levels. A baseline vitamin D 3 daily replacement of 1000-2000 IU initially with further modification based on biannual testing appears to factor in the wide variation in dose response observed with vitamin D replacement and is especially important in high-risk groups such as ethnic minorities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, cross-sectional studies report that higher vitamin D levels are associated with better lipid profiles, though vitamin D therapy does not improve the lipid profile (20). Triglyceride levels explained 5% of the variance in serum 25(OH)D levels in the Veterans Affairs study (7). Measurement of triglycerides might improve the performance of the VIDSUN questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, cross-sectional studies report that higher vitamin D levels are associated with better lipid profiles, though vitamin D therapy does not improve the lipid profile (20). Triglyceride levels explained 5% of the variance in serum 25(OH)D levels in the Veterans Affairs study (7). Measurement of triglycerides might improve the performance of the VIDSUN questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-day food diary correlated weakly, but significantly (r=0.20, P=0.04), with serum 25(OH)D levels among 165 ambulatory postmenopausal women living in the San Francisco Bay area (6). A third chart review study (7) of 14,920 veterans reported that triglyceride levels, race, season of vitamin D measurement, total cholesterol, BMI and serum calcium together accounted for 12% of the variance in serum 25(OH)D levels, with triglycerides accounting for almost 5% of the variance. The study did not identify a model that could predict either vitamin D levels or vitamin D status (7) but notably did not assess participants’ intake of vitamin D from supplements, diet or sun exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…concluded that predicted 25(OH)D scores do not adequately reflect serum 25(OH)D concentrations, and Peiris et al [13]. argued that vitamin D status cannot be reliably predicted and that common laboratory tests are required, especially for high-risk groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies have used multiple linear regression (MLR) modelling to develop these predictive models. However, the final models typically explain only a small proportion of the total variability in 25(OH)D concentration, that is, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values from such predictive models have ranged from 0.13 to 0.42[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. In some publications, predicted and actual 25(OH)D levels have been compared in a validation sample, with Spearman(9,10) or Pearson(12) correlation coefficients ranging from 0.23 to 0.51.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%