2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0211-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Balance be Boring? A Critique of the “Challenges Should Match Skills” Hypotheses in Flow Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow is characterized by enjoyment and the theory postulates that a precondition for experiencing flow is a match between challenges and skill. The FWA, in contrast, postulates that there is a slight imbalance between experienced challenge and skills (tipping toward more challenging) which is ideal for skill development ( Løvoll and Vittersø, 2014 ). Such an imbalance will lead to growth-oriented action guided by emotions like interest and engagement, not enjoyment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow is characterized by enjoyment and the theory postulates that a precondition for experiencing flow is a match between challenges and skill. The FWA, in contrast, postulates that there is a slight imbalance between experienced challenge and skills (tipping toward more challenging) which is ideal for skill development ( Løvoll and Vittersø, 2014 ). Such an imbalance will lead to growth-oriented action guided by emotions like interest and engagement, not enjoyment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It adds four transitional channels to the initial Four Channel Model: activation, control, boredom, and preoccupation, which represent subtle changes concerning the quality of subjective daily experience. Although some authors have criticized this type of flow conceptualization (Løvoll & Vittersø, 2014), the four or eight-channel model have been extensively used in flow research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many flow activities have opportunities for action-varying levels of difficulty and engagement. Some researchers have suggested that the need for a perceived balance of challenge and skill may be dependent on other conditions, if necessary at all (Løvoll and Vittersø, 2014). For example, in one study measuring flow for people using computers in the workplace, perceived control was more important for individuals with high task-scope jobs-jobs with high variety, identity, autonomy, and feedback-whereas challenge played a greater role for low task-scope individuals (Ghani and Deshpande, 1994).…”
Section: Perceived Balance Of Challenge and Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%