2018
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2018.1438641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can banks default overnight? Modelling endogenous contagion on the O/N interbank market

Abstract: We propose a new model of the liquidity driven banking system focusing on overnight interbank loans. This significant branch of the interbank market is commonly neglected in the banking system modeling and systemic risk analysis. We construct a model where banks are allowed to use both the interbank and the securities markets to manage their liquidity demand and supply as driven by prudential requirements in a volatile environment. The network of interbank loans is dynamic and simulated every day. We show how … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this argument, we use compartmental models that allow the simplification of the contagion dynamics so that few assumptions on the contagion and transmission parameters are required. Those models are particularly useful when the full set of data necessary to run more specialized and sophisticated models is not available (Cont et al, 2019;Greenwood et al, 2015;Manna and Schiavone, 2012;Smaga et al, 2015). In fact, effective contagion models require not only the real underlying network but also their complexity demands balance sheet data with sufficient granularity and other economic data which are hardly available.…”
Section: Submittedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this argument, we use compartmental models that allow the simplification of the contagion dynamics so that few assumptions on the contagion and transmission parameters are required. Those models are particularly useful when the full set of data necessary to run more specialized and sophisticated models is not available (Cont et al, 2019;Greenwood et al, 2015;Manna and Schiavone, 2012;Smaga et al, 2015). In fact, effective contagion models require not only the real underlying network but also their complexity demands balance sheet data with sufficient granularity and other economic data which are hardly available.…”
Section: Submittedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these ingredients require only aggregate balance sheet information, as well as a few model assumptions and parameters, similarly to, e.g., the approaches by Eisenberg and Noe (2001) and Battiston et al (2012) that deal with solvency contagion. Data requirement in particular is indeed a major advantage of our model with respect to more sophisticated approaches (Krause and Giansante 2012;Manna and Schiavone 2012;Aldasoro et al 2017;Halaj 2018;Smaga et al 2018;Teply and Klinger 2019;Cont et al 2020), which require not only more specific balance sheet variables (for instance, exposures split according to the seniority or type of contract-repurchase agreements, derivatives, CDS, and so on) with high time resolution, but also several assumptions to define an agent-based response of banks to shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable exception is the case of Northern Rock that defaulted in 2012 due to funding liquidity cuts in the interbank market and bank run. Indeed, systemic defaults in the interbank market seem to be possible even due to cash fluctuations alone(Smaga et al 2018). In any event, assessing systemic risk in the interbank market is important because of its interplay with other channels of contagion(Hüser 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the recently introduced macro-prudential policies have tended to rely on network models to estimate the possible impact of their implementation [5,6]. e studies on network models of financial contagion have also been growing into a large body of works, which consists of the following main streams: credit default contagion [7,8], common asset contagion [9,10], and funding liquidity contagion [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%