2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can boreal afforestation help offset incompressible GHG emissions from Canadian industries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, the early growth results in this study are contributing to the first efforts needed to help progressing the idea of LW afforestation from a potential new niche to a productive silvicultural activity [7,9], with particular relevance as a climate change mitigation measure under the growing carbon markets [9,30,66]. Moreover, plantation could be applied as underplanting without harvest prior to site preparation [7,66], thereby, leaving a part of the local genetics in the stand and recreating structural heterogeneity that is naturally occurring in natural old forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Altogether, the early growth results in this study are contributing to the first efforts needed to help progressing the idea of LW afforestation from a potential new niche to a productive silvicultural activity [7,9], with particular relevance as a climate change mitigation measure under the growing carbon markets [9,30,66]. Moreover, plantation could be applied as underplanting without harvest prior to site preparation [7,66], thereby, leaving a part of the local genetics in the stand and recreating structural heterogeneity that is naturally occurring in natural old forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The lower production, transport and planting costs associated with the use of a smaller containerized stock (higher container density in nursery and transport crates, and lighter weight), should be taken into account as the afforestation of unproductive open woodlands may represent a more risky investment than that on sites of known productivity, as long term survival and growth yield of this type of stand are still unknown [65]. Altogether, the early growth results in this study are contributing to the first efforts needed to help progressing the idea of LW afforestation from a potential new niche to a productive silvicultural activity [7,9], with particular relevance as a climate change mitigation measure under the growing carbon markets [9,30,66]. Moreover, plantation could be applied as underplanting without harvest prior to site preparation [7,66], thereby, leaving a part of the local genetics in the stand and recreating structural heterogeneity that is naturally occurring in natural old forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, adequate silvicultural strategies may maintain the resilience of desired states and transform the undesirable states [57]. The afforestation of boreal open woodlands such as LWs is also interesting when considering the greenhouse gas mitigation potential it represents in both North America and Russia [18][19][20], in spite of possible limitations that also need to be addressed [53,58] in addition to the need for long-term evaluation of the site resilience to disturbance and plantation productivity.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This human-induced conversion of open to closed-crown stands can help realize at least two goals: restore the historical tree density in the boreal forest zone [4,6,10,16], and contribute to climate change mitigation through the afforestation of non-forest areas [17][18][19]. Afforestation efforts in the boreal zone, where manageable open woodlands such as LWs are theoretically abundant in both North America and Russia [19,20], could represent an eventual significant mitigation measures, especially because land use change in boreal territories generates very few conflicts with other human activities, thanks to the uninhabited-and unsuitable for cultivation-nature of the boreal forest [17,19]. However, very few field validations of the support capacity of LWs (and boreal open woodlands in general) to afforestation presently exist, so that this theoretical mitigation potential can get closer to a field-supported feasibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest management could exploit NPP (Net primary productivity) for carbon sequestration in forests or biomass production for bio-energy through climate change mitigation (Karoshi et al 2010). In this context, many countries carried out a series of terrestrial plant attempts, such as plantation of marginal agricultural land (Niu and Duiker 2006), conservation reserve program (CRP) (Gelfand et al 2011) in the USA, afforestation of open woodlands (Boucher et al 2012), afforestation of agricultural land (Arevalo et al 2011) in Canada and forest restoration projects in China (Qin et al 2013). In 2008, the United Nations launched the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation Programme (REDD), which is among the most prominent of recent attempts to mitigate climate change (Agrawal et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%