Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to answer the focus question: “Could the gray values (GVs) from CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) be converted to Hounsfield units (HUs) in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)?” Methods: The included studies try to answer the research question according to the PICO strategy. Studies were gathered by searching several electronic databases and partial grey literature up to January 2021 without language or time restrictions. The methodological assessment of the studies was performed using The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) for in vitro studies and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) for in vivo studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE system) instrument was applied to assess the level of evidence across the studies. Results: 2710 articles were obtained in Phase 1, and 623 citations remained after removing duplicates. Only three studies were included in this review using a two-phase selection process and after applying the eligibility criteria. All studies were methodologically acceptable, although in general terms with low risks of bias. There are some included studies with quite low and limited evidence estimations and recommendation forces; evidencing the need for clinical studies with diagnostic capacity to support its use. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrated that the GVs from CBCT cannot be converted to HUs due to the lack of clinical studies with diagnostic capacity to support its use. However, it is evidenced that three conversion steps (equipment calibration, prediction equation models, and a standard formula (converting GVs to HUs)) are needed to obtain pseudo Hounsfield values instead of only obtaining them from a regression or directly from the software.

The influence of implant design on implant stability in low‐density bone under guided surgical template in inexperienced surgeons: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial using resonance frequency analysis

“…On the contrary, the latest systemic review, published in 2022, reported that greyscale values from CBCT could not be converted into HUs. The article reported that three conversion steps (Equipment calibration, correlation, prediction equation models, and standard formula) are needed to obtain the CBCT‐HUs 35 . Since the bone density of the present study was obtained from the gray scale values acquired directly from the software, this is a clear limitation and potential source of bias in this study.…”

The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption

“…It was proved that the mineral density of the osseous tissue reflects the biological activity of the bone; thus, attempts are being made to assess bone density using such a simple examination as CBCT [47]. Nevertheless, it is proven that CBCT equipment calibration and further conversion steps are needed to reliably assess the bone density in CBCT imaging [48]. Due to the fact that the imaging was performed at a remote facility, this was impossible, which constitutes a limitation of this study.…”

Imaging of Uveal Melanoma—Current Standard and Methods in Development

“…Detectors receive the signal and convert it into electrical pulses sent and analyzed by a computer. As a result, data obtained with the scanning process contain cross-sectional images of the human body [164,165]. Modern CT systems develop several special techniques.…”